New Showbiz

You are here:
How to Grow Thin

How to Grow Thin

1922

Passed

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

The story is that of Heza Gobbler and his wife, Ima Gobbler. Both were of normal size in their more youthful days, but a few years after they have “settled down” the extra fat has settled down on them so heavily that when they receive an invitation to a banquet neither can get Into the “glad rags” which have laid unused in their trunks for several years. When Mrs. Eaton Growthin, who was bridesmaid at their wedding, calls, Mrs. Ima Gobbler is moved to envy by her slender, graceful figure. Mrs. Gobbler is introduced to a specialist by her more slender friend, and in a few minutes receives his brief outline of the simple home method which she is to follow to lose weight. She follows the easy method for five months, and when she returns to the specialist’s office, his scales show that she has lost forty pounds. An entertaining story and clever comedy have been combined In "How to Grow' Thin” with a vital lesson to the great number of people who have a tendency to “grow fat.”

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

1.6/10

Minimal

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film centers on a traditional heteronormative marriage between Heza and Ima Gobbler. No queer identities or non-cisnormative subtext are present in the narrative.

Gender Representation

Limited

Ima Gobbler's agency is tied to her physical appearance and social conformity. The story reinforces a traditional hierarchy where women are defined by grace and domesticity.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

The narrative focuses on a homogeneous, likely Western middle-class experience. There is no mention of racial diversity or non-Anglo-Saxon characters.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Limited

The film promotes Western values regarding discipline and social presentation. It uses a didactic structure to teach lessons on beauty and fitness standards.

Disability Representation

Minimal

Weight is treated as a social or moral issue rather than a physical disability. The film risks using body type as a comedic device.

Strengths

  • Provides a clear window into the social values and beauty standards of the early 1920s.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks racial and ethnic diversity within the narrative.
  • Reinforces restrictive gender roles and social conformity.
  • Uses body weight as a comedic or moralizing device rather than a nuanced topic.

AI Analysis

This 1922 documentary-style comedy functions primarily as a period-specific instructional tool. It reinforces the social mores of the early 20th century by emphasizing conformity to specific beauty and domestic standards. The narrative lacks intersectional depth, focusing almost exclusively on a homogeneous, middle-class Western experience. It relies on traditional gender roles and social hierarchies to drive its comedic and didactic elements. Ultimately, the film serves to uphold existing societal norms regarding health and appearance rather than challenging or expanding the representation of diverse identities.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.