New Showbiz

You are here:
Pas vu, Pas pris

Pas vu, Pas pris

1998

Director

Pierre Carles

Runtime

78 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

"Pas vu, pas pris" starts with a subject filmed 2 years ago ; ordered then forbidden to broadcasting by Canal + : it was "Pas vu à la télé". Bernard Benyamin, Henri de Virieux, Patrick de Carolis, Anne Sinclair, Charles Villeneuve (amongst others) appear before the candid camera of Pierre Carles, for once subjected to an investigation that concerns their profession. After proclaiming that there is no taboo subject on television, they discover a pirate document showing Étienne Moujeotte and François Léotard in a business discussion about the destinies of TF1. Question asked : would they have agreed to broadcast this document and if not, why not ? The investigation itself is objectively searching : anything can be said on TV except one thing, the more or less close collusion of journalists and the political powers. Pierre Carles gives us a sharp reflection on the scope of this "fourth power" that the media have become, and on the compromises of those who are its masters.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.8/10

Fair

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The documentary focuses on media ethics and political collusion rather than identity-based storytelling. There are no LGBTQ+ characters or explorations of gender identity present in the narrative.

Gender Representation

Fair

While prominent women like Anne Sinclair appear, the investigation centers on a media elite historically dominated by men. The film prioritizes professional conduct over the subversion of gender hierarchies.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The film examines the French media establishment of the late 1990s. The subjects reflect the demographic composition of that era's broadcasting elite, showing little emphasis on racial or ethnic intersectionality.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The film excels by critiquing traditional Western institutions and the 'fourth power.' It disrupts the perceived integrity of journalistic pillars by exposing systemic political-media collusion.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no evidence that disability or neurodivergence serves as a central theme. The documentary does not utilize physical impairment as a narrative device.

Strengths

  • Provides a powerful critique of Western institutional integrity and media transparency.
  • Offers a sophisticated investigation into the systemic relationship between media and political power.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities and diverse gender-based narratives.
  • Shows limited racial and ethnic intersectionality within its subject matter.
  • Fails to address disability or neurodivergence as part of the social landscape.

AI Analysis

Pierre Carles delivers a sharp, investigative critique of the French media landscape. The film functions as a systemic study of institutional ethics, specifically targeting the collusion between journalists and political powers. It prioritizes deconstructing transparency over character-driven tropes. While the documentary lacks depth in identity-based representation, it succeeds as a cultural critique. It challenges the sanctity of established media institutions, offering a skeptical view of the 'fourth power' and the compromises made by its masters. Ultimately, the work is a specialized investigation into power dynamics. It trades social identity exploration for a rigorous examination of how media elites navigate political influence.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.