
Michael Moore in TrumpLand
2016

2017
Director
Flore Vasseur
Runtime
49 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Moscow, Russia, December 2016. Edward Snowden, Larry Lessig and Birgitta Jónsdóttir meet for the first time in a secret place. Apparently, Russia is interfering in the US presidential elections while it mourns the death of its ambassador to Turkey. Snowden carefully chooses his interviews, so nobody really knows something about him. As the world prepares for Christmas, they gather to discuss the only issue that matters, their common struggle: how to save democracy.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The documentary does not center on LGBTQ+ identities or narratives. While exploring universal human rights, the film lacks a specific lens regarding queer theory or non-cisnormative identity.
Gender Representation
The film maintains a balanced perspective by including female voices like Birgitta Jónsdóttir. It avoids reinforcing patriarchal hierarchies by granting significant agency to female activists and intellectuals.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The film adopts a globalized perspective that moves beyond Anglo-centric viewpoints. It acknowledges a multi-ethnic, globalized digital citizenry by discussing the worldwide impact of surveillance.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The narrative provides a sophisticated deconstruction of Western institutions and the surveillance-industrial complex. It explores post-colonial themes regarding how digital infrastructure serves as a tool for modern hegemony.
Disability Representation
There is no significant focus on physical or neurodivergent representation. The subject matter centers on political and digital ethics rather than the lived experiences of individuals with disabilities.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Meeting Snowden excels as an intellectual critique of institutional authority and systemic power. It successfully disrupts Western exceptionalism by framing surveillance as a global issue affecting a multi-ethnic digital citizenry. However, the film lacks depth in traditional demographic representation. It does not engage with LGBTQ+ narratives or the lived experiences of individuals with disabilities, focusing instead on high-level political ethics. Ultimately, the documentary trades demographic breadth for cultural depth. It prioritizes the subversion of the state-citizen contract and the deconstruction of capitalist-state hierarchies over individual identity politics.

2016

2021

2015

2015

2019

2016

2014

2015

2013

2018

2021

2012
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.