You are here:
Meeting Snowden

Meeting Snowden

2017

Director

Flore Vasseur

Runtime

49 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Moscow, Russia, December 2016. Edward Snowden, Larry Lessig and Birgitta Jónsdóttir meet for the first time in a secret place. Apparently, Russia is interfering in the US presidential elections while it mourns the death of its ambassador to Turkey. Snowden carefully chooses his interviews, so nobody really knows something about him. As the world prepares for Christmas, they gather to discuss the only issue that matters, their common struggle: how to save democracy.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

5.0/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The documentary does not center on LGBTQ+ identities or narratives. While exploring universal human rights, the film lacks a specific lens regarding queer theory or non-cisnormative identity.

Gender Representation

Fair

The film maintains a balanced perspective by including female voices like Birgitta Jónsdóttir. It avoids reinforcing patriarchal hierarchies by granting significant agency to female activists and intellectuals.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Good

The film adopts a globalized perspective that moves beyond Anglo-centric viewpoints. It acknowledges a multi-ethnic, globalized digital citizenry by discussing the worldwide impact of surveillance.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The narrative provides a sophisticated deconstruction of Western institutions and the surveillance-industrial complex. It explores post-colonial themes regarding how digital infrastructure serves as a tool for modern hegemony.

Disability Representation

Limited

There is no significant focus on physical or neurodivergent representation. The subject matter centers on political and digital ethics rather than the lived experiences of individuals with disabilities.

Strengths

  • Strong deconstruction of Western institutional power and the surveillance-industrial complex.
  • Effective use of female activists to balance traditionally male-dominated political discourse.
  • A globalized perspective that challenges Anglo-centric viewpoints and Western exceptionalism.

Areas for Improvement

  • Minimal representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisnormative narratives.
  • Lack of focus on physical or neurodivergent lived experiences.
  • Limited engagement with demographic diversity beyond political and intellectual circles.

AI Analysis

Meeting Snowden excels as an intellectual critique of institutional authority and systemic power. It successfully disrupts Western exceptionalism by framing surveillance as a global issue affecting a multi-ethnic digital citizenry. However, the film lacks depth in traditional demographic representation. It does not engage with LGBTQ+ narratives or the lived experiences of individuals with disabilities, focusing instead on high-level political ethics. Ultimately, the documentary trades demographic breadth for cultural depth. It prioritizes the subversion of the state-citizen contract and the deconstruction of capitalist-state hierarchies over individual identity politics.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.