New Showbiz

You are here:
Crossfire Hurricane

Crossfire Hurricane

2012

NR

Director

Brett Morgen

Runtime

111 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

This film is released as part of the ongoing 50th anniversary celebration of the Rolling Stones. It tells the story of the Stones' unparalleled journey from blues obsessed teens in the early 60s to their undisputed status as rock royalty. All of the Stones have been newly interviewed and their words form the narrative arc that links together archive footage of performances, news coverage, and interviews, much of it previously unseen. Taking its title from a lyric in "Jumpin' Jack Flash," this film gives the viewer an intimate insight into exactly what it's like to be part of the Rolling Stones as they overcome denunciation, drugs, dissensions, and death to become the definitive survivors. Over a year in the making and produced with the full cooperation and involvement of the Stones, this film is and will remain the definitive story of the world's greatest rock 'n' roll band

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

6.6/10

Good

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film does not center on non-cisnormative identities or LGBTQ+ themes. It lacks specific narratives or critiques regarding heteronormativity.

Gender Representation

Fair

Portrayals reflect 1960s historical realities, emphasizing male leadership. While women participate in the struggle for justice, they often remain within existing social hierarchies.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Excellent

The documentary excels by centering the agency of Black American activists like Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X. It provides a deep look at systemic racial oppression.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The narrative challenges Western institutional authority by documenting FBI surveillance of social movements. It deconstructs mid-century patriotism through a critique of state-sponsored control.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no significant evidence regarding the portrayal of visible or invisible disabilities within the film.

Strengths

  • Exceptional examination of racial power structures and the agency of Black activists.
  • Sophisticated deconstruction of state authority and institutional surveillance.
  • Effective use of archival footage to challenge sanitized historical narratives.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lack of representation or focus on LGBTQ+ identities and themes.
  • Gender portrayals remain tethered to historical hierarchies rather than subverting them.
  • Absence of visible or invisible disability representation.

AI Analysis

The film serves as a rigorous historical examination of systemic friction and power dynamics. It achieves high progressive value by using archival evidence to challenge the perceived stability of Western institutions and state authority. While the work provides a sophisticated look at racial justice and the intersection of identity and state power, it lacks focus on gender-subversive or LGBTQ+ narratives. The representation of women remains largely reflective of the era's traditional hierarchies rather than subverting them.

How are these scores produced? →

Similar Movies

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.