The film lacks LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. The social landscape remains strictly aligned with traditional historical structures, offering no visible subversion of sexual orientation or gender identity.

The narrative centers on male-driven political and military struggles. While women exist within the social fabric, they occupy traditional roles and lack the agency to drive the revolutionary plot.

The film excels by centering indigenous and mestizo identities. By focusing on campesinos and shamanistic elements, it provides high cultural specificity and agency to characters of color.

The story functions as a critique of centralized state power and capitalist land ownership. It frames the dismantling of the Porfirian dictatorship as a moral necessity for the peasantry.

There are no prominent depictions of visible or invisible disabilities. No characters utilize disability as a central plot device or defining trait.