You are here:

Hacking Justice

Name: Hacking Justice
Director: Juan Pancorbo, Clara López Rubio
Released: 2017
Duration: 99 min

Representation Score

5.5/10

Fair

2017

Director

Juan Pancorbo, Clara López Rubio

Runtime

99 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Hacking Justice is a documentary focused on systemic critique rather than demographic breadth. It prioritizes the deconstruction of institutional dominance and the tension between individual influence and state power. The film's strength lies in its cultural perspective, challenging the perceived stability of Western judicial systems. It treats the legal process as a contested space of struggle rather than a neutral arbiter. However, the film lacks representation across most identity categories. The focus on male-dominated legal and political spheres results in a narrow demographic scope that misses opportunities for multi-layered storytelling.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Hacking Justice have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film does not feature explicit LGBTQ+ character arcs or non-cisgender identities. It focuses on high-stakes legal and political figures, leaving little room for queer representation.

How does Hacking Justice portray gender?

Fair

The documentary centers on the professional lives of Baltasar Garzón and Julian Assange. While it explores gendered power dynamics within judicial institutions, it lacks visible women's ability to drive the story.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Hacking Justice?

Fair

The film engages with global geopolitics and international law. While the primary subjects are not defined by racial diversity, the scope touches on how global systems treat diverse actors.

How does Hacking Justice represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film excels by disrupting expectations of state infallibility. It frames Western legal and political institutions as sites of conflict and potential corruption rather than inherently righteous entities.

Does Hacking Justice include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no verifiable evidence regarding the portrayal of physical, neurodivergent, or mental health conditions within the film's narrative.

Present on Screen

Provides a strong critique of institutional dominance and Western judicial stability.
Engages with complex global geopolitics and international legal frameworks.
Challenges traditional authority by framing legal systems as sites of conflict.

Limited or Absent

Lacks visible women's ability to drive the story or the subversion of male leadership roles.
Provides no explicit representation of LGBTQ+ identities or character arcs.
Fails to include diverse racial or ethnic perspectives within its central subjects.

Official Synopsis

Since he took on the case in 2012, defending Julian Assange has put judge Baltasar Garzón's talent and ability to the test. They've won a few battles, but nobody knows how the war will end.

How are these scores produced? →