
To Have (Or Not)
1995

1998
Director
Manon Briand
Runtime
100 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Laurie, a professional downhill racer gets fired because of her slight overindulgence in irresponsibility. She returns to Montreal where she is welcomed by her geeky but cute brother. She meets Lorenzo, a cranky, ex-racer who owns a bike shop. The two become friends. Laurie gets a job with a local bicycle courier company, but a member of the group is intent on shutting her out of their circles, making her life difficult and sad. After a bonding truth-revealing discussion between Laurie and Lorenzo, Laurie begins to see what she has to do to make things better for herself.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks explicit evidence of queer identities or non-heteronormative romantic arcs. The narrative focus remains centered on the connection between Laurie and Lorenzo.
Gender Representation
Laurie is a professional athlete whose arc emphasizes self-actualization and personal agency. The male lead, Lorenzo, avoids hyper-competent masculine archetypes by being portrayed as cranky and flawed.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
While set in the diverse urban environment of Montreal, the film does not explicitly explore racial identity. The narrative focuses more on interpersonal dynamics than ethnic representation.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story examines professional instability and skepticism toward rigid career structures. It prioritizes subjective, interpersonal truths over institutional or systemic critiques of society.
Disability Representation
There is no visible representation of physical, neurodivergent, or mental health disabilities. Characters are defined primarily by their professional status and temperaments.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Manon Briand’s drama succeeds in subverting traditional gender tropes by centering on a female protagonist's autonomy. Laurie’s journey is defined by her own resilience and self-correction rather than a male savior. However, the film lacks intersectional depth. It misses opportunities to represent LGBTQ+ identities or diverse racial backgrounds, despite its Montreal setting. The narrative remains focused on individual character studies rather than broader social or systemic explorations. Ultimately, the film is a character-driven piece that prioritizes personal agency over social commentary, resulting in a moderate diversity profile.

1995

1993

2010

2005
2006

1993

2004

1982

2001

2002

1990

1999
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.