Who's Got the Black Box?
1967
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 6.0 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
Code Name: Tiger
1964
Director
Claude Chabrol
Runtime
90 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
A Turkish ambassador arrives in Paris to sign an important trade agreement, allowing Turkey to buy a sophisticated new war plane from France. Immediately he is the target of an assassin, and a special agent is assigned to protect him.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
4.4/10
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses on statecraft and security protocols. There is no evidence of non-heteronormative identities or critiques of heteronormativity within the premise.
Gender Representation
The narrative centers on a male Turkish ambassador and a special agent. Primary plot drivers are framed through traditionally masculine archetypes of authority and defense.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The film includes a non-Western protagonist, a Turkish ambassador, within a European setting. This disrupts standard Eurocentric focuses common in 1960s thrillers.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story engages with internationalism and state-level cooperation. It remains anchored in mid-century structures of sovereignty, trade agreements, and arms sales.
Disability Representation
There is no indication of characters possessing visible or invisible disabilities within the narrative.
Strengths
- The film disrupts Eurocentric norms by centering a non-Western protagonist in a major European setting.
- The narrative moves beyond purely domestic French stories to engage with international diplomacy.
Areas for Improvement
- The plot relies heavily on traditionally masculine archetypes of authority and physical defense.
- The film lacks representation of non-heteronormative identities or diverse social critiques.
- The narrative reinforces mid-century capitalist and institutional structures rather than challenging them.
AI Analysis
Claude Chabrol’s thriller functions as a traditional genre piece centered on geopolitical maneuvering. While it avoids a purely domestic French focus, it remains rooted in the conventional power structures of its era. The film provides moderate ethnic diversity by placing a Turkish diplomat at the center of an international crisis in Paris. However, this inclusion appears driven by diplomatic plot necessity rather than a broader effort to diversify the cast. Ultimately, the film adheres to mid-century archetypes. It prioritizes masculine roles of authority and institutional stability, reinforcing the status quo of international commerce and state security.
Similar Movies
The Nada Gang
1974
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.4 out of 10
To Skin a Spy
1966
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.1 out of 10
The Serpent
1973
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.8 out of 10
The Blue Panther
1965
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.7 out of 10
Weak Spot
1975
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.0 out of 10
Goodbye & Amen
1977
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.3 out of 10
Double Agents
1959
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.2 out of 10
The Jigsaw Man
1983
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.2 out of 10
The Champagne Murders
1967
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.1 out of 10
Let the Shooters Shoot
1964
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.6 out of 10
Armageddon
1977
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.1 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.