You are here:
How Awful About Allan

How Awful About Allan

1970

PG

Director

Curtis Harrington

Runtime

74 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

After an eight-month stay in a mental hospital, a tormented man comes home to live with his sister; but a mysterious boarder may be trying to kill him.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

3.5/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The narrative focuses on a domestic triad of a brother, sister, and boarder. There is no evidence of non-heteronormative identities or critiques of heteronormativity.

Gender Representation

Fair

The plot is driven by the male characters' psychological conflicts. While a sister provides a domestic support structure, the film does not subvert traditional gender hierarchies.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The film likely reflects the demographic homogeneity common in 1970s psychological thrillers. There is no indication of a non-white majority cast.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Limited

The story functions as a character study within a traditional domestic framework. It focuses on individual paranoia rather than a critique of Western institutions or religion.

Disability Representation

Fair

The protagonist's history with a mental hospital introduces themes of mental illness. However, the character risks falling into the 'madman' trope common in horror.

Strengths

  • Explores themes of mental health and the aftermath of institutionalization.
  • Utilizes stylized, atmospheric storytelling characteristic of the psychological thriller genre.

Areas for Improvement

  • Relies on traditional gender hierarchies where male psychological conflict drives the plot.
  • Risks utilizing the 'madman' trope when portraying neurodivergence or mental illness.
  • Lacks diverse representation of racial, ethnic, or LGBTQ+ identities.

AI Analysis

How Awful About Allan is a product of its era, functioning as a traditional psychological thriller. It prioritizes individualistic anxieties and psychological instability over systemic social critique or intersectional representation. The film adheres to the social norms of the early 1970s, focusing on a male-driven narrative of paranoia and domestic tension. While it touches on mental health, it does so through the lens of genre conventions rather than nuanced advocacy. Ultimately, the work lacks the intentionality required to disrupt established social hierarchies, serving instead as a stylized character study within a homogeneous demographic framework.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.