You are here:
There Is Such a Lad

There Is Such a Lad

1966

Director

Vasiliy Shukshin

Runtime

101 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

A story about Pashka, a really decent, honest guy, even though he lies a lot, who is looking for happiness and love.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

3.2/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film follows a traditional romantic trajectory centered on the protagonist's search for love. There is no evidence of LGBTQ+ characters or non-heteronormative narratives.

Gender Representation

Fair

The narrative focuses on the male protagonist, Pashka, navigating social and romantic landscapes. While the search for love implies female presence, structural agency remains centered on the male experience.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The film reflects a relatively homogeneous ethnic landscape typical of its Soviet-era setting. There is no indication of race-bending or diverse casting beyond standard demographic norms.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The story introduces moral complexity through a protagonist who is both decent and prone to lying. This focus on individualistic humanism moves away from rigid, singular didacticism.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no mention of characters with visible or invisible disabilities within the available narrative description.

Strengths

  • The protagonist offers psychological nuance through his complex blend of honesty and habitual lying.
  • The film avoids rigid didacticism by focusing on subjective morality and individualistic humanism.

Areas for Improvement

  • The narrative lacks intersectional complexity and fails to disrupt traditional social hierarchies.
  • Structural agency is heavily centered on the male experience, limiting gender diversity.
  • The ethnic landscape remains homogeneous, lacking diverse casting or racial metaphors.

AI Analysis

Vasiliy Shukshin’s work focuses on the psychological depth of the common man rather than modern intersectional frameworks. The film functions as a character-driven romantic comedy rooted in the social realism of 1966. It prioritizes individual temperament and personal honesty over systemic critique. While the protagonist's moral ambiguity provides psychological nuance, the film lacks the disruption of traditional social hierarchies. The narrative architecture remains centered on a singular male experience within a homogeneous cultural milieu. Ultimately, the film reflects the standard demographic and social norms of its era, offering humanistic depth without addressing broader identity-based representation.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.