You are here:

An Eye for an Eye

An Eye for an Eye

Representation Score

3.6/10

Limited

1957

Director

André Cayatte

Runtime

113 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

André Cayatte’s thriller is a narrow, male-dominated exploration of judicial morality. While it excels in its intellectual critique of state power, it remains confined by the social norms of 1957, lacking in diverse identities and inclusive casting. The film's strength lies in its thematic depth, especially in its examination of the legal system. However, it falls short in providing gender diversity and exploring multi-layered racial dynamics.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does An Eye for an Eye have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not depict any non-straight relationships or identities. It adheres closely to traditional mid-20th-century social norms.

How does An Eye for an Eye portray gender?

Limited

The story focuses on male characters who have significant control over the plot. Female characters play important emotional roles but do not drive the story independently.

How racially and ethnically diverse is An Eye for an Eye?

Limited

The cast is mostly white and European, reflecting the era's casting practices. Despite being set in North Africa, the film does not give substantial roles to non-white characters.

How does An Eye for an Eye represent religion and culture?

Good

The film provides a sophisticated critique of Western institutions, particularly questioning the state's authority and examining the complexities of systemic failure and moral judgment.

Does An Eye for an Eye include disability representation?

Minimal

The film does not feature any characters with physical or cognitive disabilities. The focus remains on psychological themes and critiques of systemic issues.

Present on Screen

  • Provides a sophisticated critique of Western institutional authority and the flaws within the judicial system.
  • Offers a nuanced exploration of moral relativism through the lens of state-sanctioned retribution.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks gender diversity, relegating female characters to supporting roles without independent control.
  • Fails to utilize its North African setting to explore multi-layered racial dynamics or non-white perspectives.
  • Provides no representation for LGBTQ+ identities or individuals with disabilities.

Official Synopsis

In North Africa, an anguished husband tests the character of the doctor he believes is responsible for his wife’s death.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.