You are here:
Bad Liaisons

Bad Liaisons

1955

Director

Alexandre Astruc

Runtime

84 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Catherine Racan, a young journalist who always puts her career over her love life, is brought in by the police for questioning. They are looking for a doctor who illegally performs abortions and now they are interrogating all of his previous clients.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

5.1/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The film lacks explicit queer character arcs or same-sex intimacy. However, the focus on illegal medical procedures suggests a narrative environment that engages with marginalized social realities.

Gender Representation

Good

Catherine Racan disrupts traditional hierarchies by prioritizing her career over domesticity. This portrayal of a professional woman navigating reproductive agency challenges mid-century tropes of female submissiveness.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The film appears to reflect the demographic homogeneity of its era. There is no evidence of significant racial blending or a non-Anglo-Saxon majority cast.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The narrative critiques traditional institutions by centering on illegal abortions. It prioritizes secular, individualistic values over religious morality and state-sanctioned legal frameworks.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no information regarding characters with physical or neurodivergent disabilities in the narrative.

Strengths

  • Strong portrayal of female professional autonomy and agency.
  • Effective critique of institutional authority and religious morality.
  • Engages with complex social taboos regarding reproductive rights.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lack of visible racial and ethnic diversity.
  • Absence of explicit LGBTQ+ representation or character arcs.

AI Analysis

Bad Liaisons stands out as a social drama that challenges mid-century social norms through its focus on female professional autonomy. By centering on a journalist who values her career over romance, the film provides a sophisticated look at gender agency. However, the film is limited by the demographic homogeneity typical of 1955 French cinema. The lack of visible racial diversity and explicit LGBTQ+ representation prevents a higher cumulative score. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its systemic critique of medical and legal institutions, particularly regarding reproductive autonomy and the scrutiny of non-conformist women.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.