New Showbiz

You are here:
Ebola: The Doctors' Story

Ebola: The Doctors' Story

2016

TV-PG

Director

Steven Grandison

Runtime

41 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Join Dr. Javid Abdelmoneim, a British emergency response doctor, inside a Doctors Without Borders Ebola treatment center in Kalilahun, Sierra Leone as the epidemic escalated dramatically in fall 2014. Attached to the doctors’ goggles, cameras designed to enter the “hot zone” of the facility reveal for the first time the realities of battling an unprecedented outbreak. Dr. Abdelmoneim, along with local and international colleagues, fights for the survival of his patients, and helps families reunite or cope with overwhelming loss.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

5.9/10

Fair

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The documentary focuses strictly on the clinical and humanitarian realities of a medical emergency. There is no discernible presence of LGBTQ+ identities or non-heteronormative relationship dynamics.

Gender Representation

Fair

Male and female medical professionals are shown exercising high levels of agency and leadership in high-stress zones. The film presents a meritocratic view of expertise that includes significant female participation.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Excellent

The film integrates the agency of local West African medical staff and the affected population. It avoids the 'savior' trope by highlighting the essential role of local expertise and community resilience.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The narrative focuses on secular, scientific, and humanitarian imperatives rather than Western-centric moralities. It portrays the struggle of the local population as a systemic battle against a biological catastrophe.

Disability Representation

Fair

Representation is primarily incidental, focusing on the physical toll of the virus. It provides a raw look at acute physical impairments caused by the epidemic while treating victims with dignity.

Strengths

  • Highlights the essential agency and expertise of local West African medical professionals.
  • Avoids the 'savior' trope by showcasing global cooperation between international and local staff.
  • Presents a meritocratic professional environment where gender hierarchies are flattened by the crisis.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks any discernible narrative focus or presence of LGBTQ+ identities.
  • Disability representation is incidental and limited to the acute physical effects of the virus.
  • Does not explicitly seek to subvert or explore traditional gender roles beyond professional merit.

AI Analysis

The film succeeds as an observational documentary that disrupts traditional Western-centric humanitarian reporting. By centering both international and local medical responders, it challenges conventional hierarchies of expertise and provides a nuanced view of global cooperation. Its primary strength lies in its depiction of racial and ethnic diversity, specifically through the inclusion of West African agency. This prevents the narrative from falling into simplistic tropes often found in crisis journalism. However, the film's scope is narrow, focusing almost exclusively on the epidemiological response. This results in a lack of representation regarding LGBTQ+ identities and intentional disability narratives.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.