You are here:

Experimenter

Name: Experimenter
Director: Michael Almereyda
Released: 2015
Duration: 97 min

Representation Score

3.3/10

Limited

2015

PG-13

Director

Michael Almereyda

Runtime

97 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Experimenter is a thoughtful, postmodern exploration of authority and human behavior. It emphasizes intellectual deconstruction over demographic representation, focusing on the ethical implications of institutional power. The film's strength lies in its critical examination of systemic compliance and the complexities of Stanley Milgram's legacy. However, it adheres closely to the demographic realities of a 1960s academic setting, resulting in limited representation of diverse identities.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Experimenter have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film centers on the lives of Stanley and Sasha Milgram, with no prominent LGBTQ+ characters or narratives critiquing straight relationships.

How does Experimenter portray gender?

Fair

The story highlights the rigid gender roles of the 1960s academic world. While Sasha Milgram is present, the plot mainly revolves around Stanley's scientific work.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Experimenter?

Limited

Reflecting the era, the cast is mostly white, with limited representation of minorities in the background of the academic setting.

How does Experimenter represent religion and culture?

Good

The film examines the harmful effects of scientific institutions and delves into moral relativism. It employs postmodern techniques to question the stability of historical truths.

Does Experimenter include disability representation?

Minimal

There are no significant portrayals of physical or neurodivergent disabilities that play a key role in the narrative or character development.

Present on Screen

Provides a sophisticated critique of institutional power and systemic harm.
Employs postmodern techniques to challenge traditional, singular historical narratives.
Offers a nuanced perspective on the personal impact of 1960s social hierarchies.

Limited or Absent

Lacks significant racial and ethnic diversity among the main characters.
Includes minimal LGBTQ+ representation or narratives about non-straight identities.
Does not feature significant portrayals of physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

Official Synopsis

Yale University, 1961. Stanley Milgram designs a psychology experiment that still resonates to this day, in which people think they’re delivering painful electric shocks to an affable stranger strapped into a chair in another room. Despite his pleads for mercy, the majority of subjects don’t stop the experiment, administering what they think is a near-fatal electric shock, simply because they’ve been told to do so. With Nazi Adolf Eichmann’s trial airing in living rooms across America, Milgram strikes a nerve in popular culture and the scientific community with his exploration into people’s tendency to comply with authority. Celebrated in some circles, he is also accused of being a deceptive, manipulative monster, but his wife Sasha stands by him through it all.

How are these scores produced? →