You are here:

Good Satan

Name: Good Satan
Director: Sara Lohman
Released: 2012
Duration: 81 min

Representation Score

5.4/10

Fair

2012

Director

Sara Lohman

Runtime

81 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Good Satan is a satirical deconstruction of religious certainty and traditional moral hierarchies. It succeeds by questioning Western institutions and prioritizing individual autonomy over rigid, binary dogma. While the film lacks specific racial or LGBTQ+ identities, it finds strength in its subversion of patriarchal structures. It replaces the archetype of the stable, masculine divine leader with more vulnerable and complex characters. Ultimately, the film's progressive value lies in its institutional critique. It favors situational ethics and moral relativism, challenging the viewer to question established authority and singular Christian morality.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Good Satan have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film examines unconventional relationships and questions traditional celestial hierarchies. However, it does not explicitly feature LGBTQ+ identities or specific stories, focusing instead on overturning the divine couple cliché.

How does Good Satan portray gender?

Good

The narrative challenges traditional hierarchies by highlighting the roles of non-traditional figures. It undermines masculine divine archetypes by depicting celestial leaders as ineffective or foolish, while giving power to outsiders.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Good Satan?

Limited

The cast appears relatively uniform, focusing on a suburban or urban setting. There is no significant evidence of casting actors from diverse backgrounds or non-Anglo-Saxon cultures.

How does Good Satan represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film excels at criticizing organized religion and Western institutions. It portrays religious doctrine as a source of conflict and frames the Second Coming as a superficial social event.

Does Good Satan include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no evidence regarding the portrayal of visible or invisible disabilities as a central narrative driver or through a lens of empowerment.

Present on Screen

Aggressively critiques Western religious institutions and dogma.
Challenges traditional gender hierarchies and masculine divine archetypes.
Highlights individual empowerment and subjective morality over rigid structures.

Limited or Absent

Lacks explicit LGBTQ+ character identities or specific LGBTQ+ narratives.
Minimal representation of racial or ethnic diversity within the cast.
No visible or invisible disabilities portrayed as central narrative drivers.

Official Synopsis

A camera crew has the unique opportunity to record Satan in his natural habitat and it looks like he's quite happy with it. He has the perfect job, he is for the most part feared and respected, and his minions jump to his every whim. After 6,000 years he is invited back to heaven, and he goes - expecting to return to his place beside God as Lucifer, the Angel of Light. But when it turns out the invitation is not for the expected welcome home, but is rather for Christ's Second Coming-out party, things quickly go to hell. Worse, his former girlfriend is now partnering with the biggest douche-bag in Heaven. Satan decides he misses the place anyway, and wants back in. So he decides he needs to find a way to re-earn God's respect in order to be welcomed back. We learn that the Devil does for once care - kind of.

How are these scores produced? →