You are here:
The Last Man on the Moon

The Last Man on the Moon

2016

Director

Mark Craig

Runtime

99 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

The 1960s was an extraordinary time for the United States. Unburdened by post-war reparations, Americans were preoccupied with other developments like NASA, the game-changing space programme that put Neil Armstrong on the moon. Yet it was astronauts like Eugene Cernan who paved the uneven, perilous path to lunar exploration. A test pilot who lived to court danger, he was recruited along with 14 other men in a secretive process that saw them become the closest of friends and adversaries. In this intensely competitive environment, Cernan was one of only three men who was sent twice to the moon, with his second trip also being NASA’s final lunar mission. As he looks back at what he loved and lost during the eight years in Houston, an incomparably eventful life emerges into view. Director Mark Craig crafts a quietly epic biography that combines the rare insight of the surviving former astronauts with archival footage and otherworldly moonscapes.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

1.9/10

Minimal


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film focuses on the professional lives of male astronauts within the Apollo era. It lacks LGBTQ+ characters or narratives that challenge the traditional social norms of the 1960s.

Gender Representation

Limited

The documentary centers on Eugene Cernan and a cohort of men, emphasizing masculine archetypes like bravery and risk-taking. It lacks female agency, reflecting the institutional limitations of the period.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

The narrative examines a NASA era characterized by a lack of racial diversity in the astronaut corps. The recruitment focus suggests a homogeneous group reflecting systemic exclusions of the time.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Limited

The film celebrates mid-century American technological triumphs and nationalistic pride. It leans toward Western narratives of progress and institutional excellence without exploring alternative cultural frameworks.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no evidence regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities. The focus remains on the physical rigors of test piloting and lunar exploration.

Strengths

  • Provides rare, intimate insight into the lives of surviving Apollo-era astronauts.
  • Uses archival footage and moonscapes to create a visually epic biographical experience.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks female agency or perspectives within the historical narrative.
  • Reflects the systemic racial and gender exclusions of the 1960s without subversion.
  • Focuses heavily on traditional masculine archetypes and Western institutional progress.

AI Analysis

The documentary functions as a period-specific biography, meaning its lack of diversity is a reflection of the 1960s space program rather than a modern editorial choice. The narrative is built around the historical reality of a highly homogeneous astronaut corps. While the film provides an epic look at Eugene Cernan's life, it reinforces traditional masculine archetypes and Western institutional triumphs. It documents a specific era of American history where systemic exclusions were the norm. Ultimately, the film prioritizes historical accuracy and the documentation of a specific group of men, resulting in a narrow scope that lacks intersectional representation.

How are these scores produced? →

Similar Movies

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.