
The Last Man on the Moon
2016

2007
PGDirector
David Sington
Runtime
109 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Archival material from the original NASA film footage – much of it seen for the first time – plus interviews with the surviving astronauts, including Jim Lovell, Dave Scott, John Young, Gene Cernan, Mike Collins, Buzz Aldrin, Alan Bean, Edgar Mitchell, Charlie Duke and Harrison Schmitt.
Overall Score
Minimal
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The documentary focuses exclusively on Apollo-era astronauts and NASA personnel. No LGBTQ+ characters or non-cisnormative identities appear in the archival footage or contemporary interviews.
Gender Representation
The narrative centers on mid-20th-century space programs and rigid traditional hierarchies. Subjects and archival footage primarily feature male astronauts, offering little inclusion of female agency in scientific or pilot roles.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The film serves as a historical record of the Apollo missions, which featured a homogeneous demographic profile. Interviewees and primary subjects are predominantly white, reflecting the 1960s space race.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film celebrates Western scientific achievement and American institutional progress. It reinforces a narrative of Western technological exceptionalism without offering anti-capitalist or anti-Western critiques.
Disability Representation
The film does not feature subjects with visible or invisible disabilities as central to the narrative. The focus remains on the physical and cognitive performance required for lunar exploration.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
This documentary functions as a chronological record of the Apollo program, prioritizing archival accuracy over the deconstruction of social norms. Because it adheres to the historical reality of the 1960s, the demographic profile remains largely homogeneous. The film captures a specific era of Western technological advancement. While it provides a profound look at human achievement, it does not attempt to challenge the social or gender hierarchies inherent to that period. Ultimately, the work is a celebration of institutional success rather than a platform for intersectional identities or diverse representation.

2016

1996

2021

2015

2019

2020

2000

2011

2003

2011

2020

2002
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.