
The Feast of the Goat
2006

2007
RDirector
Roger Spottiswoode
Runtime
112 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
In 1993, Canadian Lieutenant General Roméo Dallaire was sent by the United Nations to Rwanda as commander of the United Nations Assistance Mission for Rwanda (UNAMIR). Its mission, to ensure the ceasefire, is underfunded, excessively bureaucratized and made up of military units which come from dozens of countries and which each have a very different program... These are Lt Gen Dallaire's efforts to stop the madness of the Rwandan Genocide, despite the complete indifference of his superiors.
Overall Score
Good
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film contains no identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. The story focuses exclusively on the geopolitical and humanitarian crisis of the Rwandan Genocide.
Gender Representation
The narrative is driven by male perspectives, specifically through military and journalistic lenses. While women are central to the tragedy as victims, they often lack primary agency in the plot.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The film excels by utilizing a predominantly Black cast to portray the Rwandan population. It avoids whitewashing and provides a sophisticated critique of how colonial-era ethnic classifications were weaponized.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film offers a profound critique of Western institutionalism and global apathy. It challenges Western hegemony by portraying the United Nations as paralyzed by bureaucracy and moral indifference.
Disability Representation
Physical and psychological traumas are depicted as consequences of conflict rather than intentional character studies. The film touches on PTSD, though it treats these as symptoms of trauma rather than agency.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Shake Hands with the Devil is a significant work of historical realism that challenges traditional narratives of Western heroism. It succeeds by refusing to romanticize international intervention, instead highlighting the systemic failures of global institutions. The film's primary strength lies in its rigorous engagement with post-colonial dynamics and the devastating impact of colonial legacies on ethnic identity. By centering the African experience, it avoids common pitfalls of historical dramas. However, the film remains limited by its narrow focus on masculine leadership and its lack of representation for LGBTQ+ identities. The narrative architecture prioritizes geopolitical and military perspectives over a broader spectrum of social identities.

2006

2000

2021

1975

1996

2010

2017

2018

2006

2020

1948

2008
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.