You are here:

A Farmer in Montfaucon

Name: A Farmer in Montfaucon
Director: Éric Rohmer
Released: 1968
Duration: 13 min

Representation Score

1.6/10

Minimal

1968

Director

Éric Rohmer

Runtime

13 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Éric Rohmer’s work functions as a psychological inquiry into individual ethics rather than a vehicle for systemic social critique. The film is deeply rooted in the specific demographic and social realities of 1960s rural France, which limits its broad representation of different identities. While the film lacks racial and LGBTQ+ diversity, it succeeds in deconstructing moral hierarchies. It replaces rigid structures with a sophisticated exploration of situational ethics and human behavior. Ultimately, the film's value lies in its character-driven realism and its nuanced depiction of how personal desire disrupts social propriety.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does A Farmer in Montfaucon have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film focuses on the assumption that everyone is straight or cisgender. There are no non-assuming gender matches what was assigned at birth identities or critiques of the idea that everyone is straight.

How does A Farmer in Montfaucon portray gender?

Fair

The story centers on the male perspective and the tension between male impulses and women's roles. Women serve as catalysts for the protagonist's moral growth rather than being passive objects.

How racially and ethnically diverse is A Farmer in Montfaucon?

Minimal

The setting reflects the demographic uniformity of 1960s rural France. The cast represents a traditional, localized European population without diverse ethnic backgrounds.

How does A Farmer in Montfaucon represent religion and culture?

Fair

The film explores moral relativism through the 'moral tale' tradition. It depicts a vanishing agrarian lifestyle and the complexities of individual ethics in a changing society.

Does A Farmer in Montfaucon include disability representation?

Minimal

The film contains no visible or invisible disabilities within its narrative.

Present on Screen

Sophisticated exploration of situational ethics and moral subjectivity.
Nuanced depiction of women's roles as drivers of psychological conflict.
Authentic portrayal of the disappearing 1960s French agrarian lifestyle.

Limited or Absent

Lack of racial and ethnic diversity within the cast and setting.
Absence of LGBTQ+ representation or non-assuming gender matches what was assigned at birth identities.
No depiction of disability or diverse social perspectives.

Official Synopsis

In just a few simple lines, a picture of the French countryside in the 1960s: the last moments of a disappearing, changing world. The simplest documentary images are there to make us aware of the raison d’être of agriculture, harvesting the fruits of a cyclical and repetitive nature.

How are these scores produced? →