The Gleaners and I: Two Years Later
2002
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 6.9 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
The Gleaners and I
2000
NRDirector
Agnès Varda
Runtime
82 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Varda focuses her eye on gleaners: those who scour already-reaped fields for the odd potato or turnip. Her investigation leads from forgotten corners of the French countryside to off-hours at the green markets of Paris, following those who insist on finding a use for that which society has cast off, whether out of necessity or activism.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
6.8/10
Good
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses on socioeconomic and existential themes rather than sexual orientation. It lacks specific, identifiable LGBTQ+ character arcs or critiques of heteronormativity.
Gender Representation
Varda disrupts traditional hierarchies by centering the female gaze. She positions herself as the authoritative narrator, using her own aging body as a primary site of inquiry.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The film explores various socioeconomic strata within France. While not featuring a majority non-white cast, it uses the 'discarded' as a metaphor for those marginalized by systemic structures.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The narrative offers a profound critique of modern consumerism. It frames gleaning as a dignified response to industrial excess, challenging capitalist notions of waste and ownership.
Disability Representation
Varda addresses the physical realities of aging and changing bodily capabilities. She treats these biological vulnerabilities with agency and dignity within a broader philosophical inquiry.
Strengths
- Subverts traditional gender hierarchies by centering a female narrator and intellectual lead.
- Provides a sophisticated critique of capitalist consumption and industrial waste.
- Treats the physical realities of aging with dignity and philosophical depth.
Areas for Improvement
- Lacks explicit LGBTQ+ character arcs or narratives centered on non-cisnormative identities.
- Features limited explicit racial and ethnic diversity within the cast.
AI Analysis
Agnès Varda’s documentary is a masterclass in subverting traditional cinematic authority. By centering the female gaze and her own aging body, she dismantles the male-driven perspectives common in mainstream media. The film excels in its cultural critique, transforming the act of scavenging into a poetic rebellion against consumerist waste. It finds profound value in the discarded, both physically and socially. While the work lacks explicit focus on LGBTQ+ identities or diverse racial representation, its strength lies in its intersectional look at class and the human condition.
Similar Movies
Women Reply
1975
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 6.6 out of 10
Daguerréotypes
1978
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 6.7 out of 10
Alice Waters and Her Delicious Revolution
2003
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.9 out of 10
Faces Places
2017
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 6.8 out of 10
Something Better to Come
2014
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 6.3 out of 10
Vegan: Everyday Stories
2016
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 6.1 out of 10
Inhabit: A Permaculture Perspective
2015
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 6.2 out of 10
The Trader
2018
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 6.1 out of 10
A Place at the Table
2012
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 6.3 out of 10
The Edge of the World
2014
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 6.3 out of 10
In the Land of the Deaf
1992
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 6.4 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.