You are here:

The Rats Are Coming! The Werewolves Are Here!

Name: The Rats Are Coming! The Werewolves Are Here!
Director: Andy Milligan
Released: 1972
Duration: 92 min

Representation Score

2.4/10

Limited

1972

Director

Andy Milligan

Runtime

92 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

This exploitation horror film sticks closely to the traditional frameworks of 1970s genre cinema. The narrative prioritizes survival clichés over any attempt to challenge social expectations or offer diverse representation. The production lacks diversity across all measured categories, resulting in a homogeneous cast and conventional character dynamics. It functions primarily as a niche genre piece rather than a vehicle for progressive storytelling. Ultimately, the film's focus remains on its supernatural premise, leaving little room for meaningful representation of underrepresented identities or cultural critiques.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does The Rats Are Coming! The Werewolves Are Here! have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not include any non-binary gender identities or same-sex relationships. It follows traditional 1970s social structures without any LGBTQ+ presence.

How does The Rats Are Coming! The Werewolves Are Here! portray gender?

Limited

A female character tries to break a family curse, but the film relies on traditional gender roles and clichés such as the damsel in distress.

How racially and ethnically diverse is The Rats Are Coming! The Werewolves Are Here!?

Minimal

The cast is mostly made up of actors from similar backgrounds, reflecting the era's casting practices and limited scope. There is no evidence of diverse racial representation.

How does The Rats Are Coming! The Werewolves Are Here! represent religion and culture?

Limited

The story focuses on immediate physical dangers like rats and werewolves. It does not engage with critiques of Western institutions, religion, or patriotism.

Does The Rats Are Coming! The Werewolves Are Here! include disability representation?

Minimal

There are no prominent depictions of physical or neurodivergent disabilities. Characters struggle with external supernatural threats rather than internal or systemic challenges.

Present on Screen

The central female character drives the narrative by trying to break a family curse.

Limited or Absent

The film relies heavily on outdated gender roles and traditional clichés.
The cast lacks racial and ethnic diversity, reflecting limited production scope.
There is a complete absence of LGBTQ+ representation or non-cisgender identities.
The story fails to address disability or neurodivergent experiences.

Official Synopsis

In early 20th-century England, the Mooneys are an eccentric clan live in a large rural home. Invalid patriarch Pa is a retired medical doctor claiming to be 199 years old. Phoebe, the eldest daughter, runs the household. Eldest son Mortimer is a businessman who conducts the finances and contributes to the income. Younger daughter Monica is a sadist who keeps live rats as pets, frequently mutilating them and other small animals. Youngest son Malcolm is a half-wit with animalistic tendencies to the point where he's kept locked in a room with live chickens. But the whole family have a dark, furry secret.

How are these scores produced? →