You are here:
Moon of the Wolf

Moon of the Wolf

1972

Not Rated

Director

Daniel Petrie

Runtime

75 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

After several locals are viciously murdered, a Louisiana sheriff starts to suspect he may be dealing with a werewolf.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

2.2/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film contains no discernible LGBTQ+ characters or explorations of non-heteronormative identities. The social structures depicted remain strictly conventional for the period.

Gender Representation

Fair

The narrative centers on a female protagonist, granting her agency and complexity through the 'monstrous feminine' trope. However, she remains an object of investigation by patriarchal authority figures.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

Casting is predominantly homogeneous, reflecting the demographic constraints of its rural setting. The film lacks significant racial or ethnic diversity or non-white casting.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The story explores the friction between rationalism and religious superstition. It critiques mob mentality and the dangers of communal vigilantism within traditional village structures.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no evidence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities being utilized as central narrative drivers or portrayed with specific agency.

Strengths

  • The central female protagonist is granted a level of agency and complexity that challenges passive horror tropes.
  • The film provides a thoughtful critique of religious superstition and the dangers of communal vigilantism.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks racial and ethnic diversity, reflecting a homogeneous casting approach.
  • There is no representation of LGBTQ+ identities or characters with disabilities.
  • The female lead's agency is often framed through the lens of patriarchal scrutiny.

AI Analysis

Moon of the Wolf is a traditional genre piece that operates within the socio-cultural boundaries of 1972. While it avoids the progressive breadth found in more intersectional works, it offers a nuanced look at gender through its central protagonist. The film's strength lies in its thematic critique of superstition and mob violence. However, the production is limited by a lack of demographic diversity. The casting is largely homogeneous, and the narrative lacks representation for LGBTQ+ individuals or characters with disabilities. The film remains a product of its era, focusing on established genre conventions rather than intentional systemic subversion.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.