You are here:

Going Crooked

Name: Going Crooked
Director: George Melford
Released: 1926
Duration: 60 min

Representation Score

1.7/10

Minimal

1926

Passed

Director

George Melford

Runtime

60 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Going Crooked is a product of the bk20s studio system, prioritizing traditional crime-melodrama archetypes over demographic breadth. While it avoids some common clichés, it lacks multi-layered complexity. The film's strength lies in its characterization of the female lead, who possesses an ethical compass that drives the plot. This provides a more nuanced perspective than the standard 'damsel in distress' seen in many silent era dramas. However, the film is limited by the era's casting norms and narrative focus. It offers almost no representation for racial minorities, LGBTQ+ individuals, or people with disabilities, resulting in a narrow social scope.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Going Crooked have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not include any LGBTQ+ characters or non-straight identities. It follows a traditional crime-drama structure typical of the 1920s.

How does Going Crooked portray gender?

Fair

The female protagonist plays a significant role in driving the story by refusing to participate in a violent robbery. However, her role in the legal drama remains undefined.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Going Crooked?

Minimal

There is no indication of a diverse cast or non-Anglo-Saxon characters. The production likely adhered to the homogeneous casting norms of the era.

How does Going Crooked represent religion and culture?

Fair

The story critiques systemic failure through a District Attorney's wrongful conviction. This focus on legal injustice aligns with traditional crime-melodrama clichés.

Does Going Crooked include disability representation?

Minimal

No characters with visible or invisible disabilities are mentioned in the narrative. The film does not address disability representation.

Present on Screen

The female protagonist demonstrates moral decision-making and internal autonomy by rejecting violence.
The narrative explores themes of systemic failure and institutional corruption within the legal system.

Limited or Absent

The film lacks racial and ethnic diversity, adhering to the homogeneous casting of its time.
There is no representation of LGBTQ+ identities or characters with disabilities.
The cultural critique is limited to legal injustice rather than broader social or systemic themes.

Official Synopsis

A young women is part a jewel theft ring, but opts out of a robbery because guns will be used. A man gets killed in that operation and the district attorney convicts an innocent man.

How are these scores produced? →