
What the #$*! Do We (K)now!?
2004

2008
RDirector
Larry Charles
Runtime
101 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Commentator-comic Bill Maher plays devil's advocate with religion as he talks to believers about their faith. Traveling around the world, Maher examines the tenets of Christianity, Judaism and Islam and raises questions about homosexuality, proof of Christ's existence, Jewish Sabbath laws, violent Muslim extremists.
Overall Score
Good
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film critiques religious dogma as a systemic barrier to queer agency. It shifts the focus from individual morality to the perceived irrationality of institutional prohibitions against non-cisnormative identities.
Gender Representation
The narrative prioritizes the intersection of faith and rationalism over gender hierarchies. It lacks a concentrated effort to elevate female agency or deconstruct specific gendered power dynamics.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
A globalized perspective moves beyond Anglo-Saxon frameworks to include Hindu, Buddhist, Muslim, and Jewish practitioners. This approach places various ethnic identities on an equal footing of scrutiny.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film deconstructs traditional Western institutions by prioritizing secularism and scientific rationalism. It frames sacred texts and religious authorities as sources of social division and historical conflict.
Disability Representation
There is no significant evidence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities being utilized as central plot devices or portrayed with specific agency.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Religulous serves as a provocative critique of traditional social pillars, leaning heavily into a secular and pluralistic worldview. Its strength lies in its globalized scope, which challenges the hegemony of Western religious perspectives by examining a wide array of faiths. However, the film's focus remains primarily ideological. While it successfully deconstructs institutional authority, it does not deeply engage with gendered power dynamics or provide meaningful representation for individuals with disabilities. Ultimately, the film functions as a tool for social deconstruction, prioritizing the tension between religious dogma and scientific rationalism over interpersonal or identity-based representation.

2004

2019

2013

2015

2015

2016

2016

2015

2006

2019
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.