
Lo and Behold: Reveries of the Connected World
2016

2013
Director
Gus Holwerda
Runtime
77 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Scientists Richard Dawkins and Lawrence Krauss travel the globe promoting a scientific worldview and the rational questioning of religious belief.
Overall Score
Good
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses on the friction between scientific rationalism and religious dogma. While it does not center explicit queer narratives, the core mission of questioning religious belief engages with theological arguments often used to marginalize non-heteronormative identities.
Gender Representation
Intellectual agency is concentrated in male protagonists Richard Dawkins and Lawrence Krauss. The documentary leans toward traditional academic discourse, which historically prioritizes male voices in evolutionary biology and physics.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The narrative travels globally to engage with various cultures and religious practices. This provides a platform for non-Western perspectives and diverse ethnic backgrounds, moving away from a purely Anglo-centric worldview.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film demonstrates high levels of secularism by promoting a scientific worldview over religious tradition. It critiques traditional moral authorities by framing organized religion through the lens of rational skepticism.
Disability Representation
There is no discernible focus on visible or invisible disabilities within the documentary's scope.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
The Unbelievers functions as a documentary critique of traditional institutional power. It achieves its score through a strong cultural positioning that prioritizes secular humanism and empirical truth over religious dogma. While the film lacks high-density representation in gender and LGBTQ+ casting, it succeeds in its global scope. By documenting religious practices across different continents, it disrupts the dominance of Western-centric religious narratives. Ultimately, the film promotes intellectual pluralism by challenging established theological frameworks through a scientific lens.

2016

2006

2019

2015

2016

2018

2010

2006

2008

2017

2004

2014
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.