New Showbiz

You are here:
The Ostrich Has Two Eggs

The Ostrich Has Two Eggs

1957

Director

Denys de La Patellière

Runtime

82 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

A father discovers one day that one of his sons is a homosexual and the other, is the "gigolo" of a Japanese countess. He is first horrified, but finally accepts the situation because it brings him economical advantages.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

6.0/10

Good


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Good

The film centers on a son's homosexuality as a primary plot driver. This inclusion marks a progressive departure from total erasure for 1957, though the narrative eventually pivots toward economic pragmatism.

Gender Representation

Fair

The story operates within a patriarchal framework focused on the father's authority. While the gigolo subplot subverts some masculine roles, female characters primarily serve as catalysts for male economic shifts.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

A Japanese countess introduces non-Western elements into the French setting. This cross-cultural interaction drives the plot, though it remains unclear if the character serves as meaningful representation or an exotic trope.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The film explores moral relativism through a protagonist who accepts his sons for financial gain. This framing suggests familial acceptance can be transactional rather than based on spiritual or moral imperatives.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no evidence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities in the narrative.

Strengths

  • The film engages with non-heteronormative identities as central plot drivers rather than peripheral elements.
  • The inclusion of a Japanese countess introduces international and non-Western perspectives into a domestic setting.
  • The narrative subverts traditional masculine roles through the introduction of a gigolo subplot.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film relies on transactional morality, where social acceptance is motivated by economic gain rather than empathy.
  • Female characters lack autonomy, functioning primarily as catalysts for the male characters' financial shifts.
  • The patriarchal framework remains dominant, centering the narrative on the father's authority and reactions.

AI Analysis

The film acts as a transitional text for its era, introducing non-heteronormative identities and cross-cultural dynamics into a mid-century comedy. It challenges rigid social hierarchies by making these identities central to the plot. However, the film's progressive elements are undercut by a cynical, transactional morality. The acceptance of social differences is motivated by material advantage rather than genuine empathy or character growth. Ultimately, the work sits between progressive inclusion and traditional storytelling, using diversity as a tool for economic plot progression rather than deep character exploration.

How are these scores produced? →

Similar Movies

Movie poster for Coming In

Coming In

2014

No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.7 out of 10

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.