
The Last Relic
1970

1956
Director
Leo Esakia
Runtime
90 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
The 17th century rebellion in Kakheti masterminded by Bidzina Cholokashvili gets about the whole Georgia. An Imeretian youth nicknamed as Bashi-Achuk is a real exterminator of the Persians. He attacks the Persian escort and sets free the Georgian women who were supposed to be locked up in the Shah’s harem. Bashi-Achuk’s twin sisters are among the rescued captives. Abdushahil, a Persian warrior who was defeated by Bashi-Achuk in wrestling, falls in love with Mzisa, Bashi-achuk’s sister. Mzisa brings Abdushahil to the camp of the Georgian rebels. Abdushahil learns that he is a Georgian too. As a child he was kidnapped and brought up in Persia. Abdushahil’s army gives up and the Georgians win the battle.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks explicit depictions of LGBTQ+ identities. The narrative focuses on traditional romantic pairings and familial bonds within a historical setting.
Gender Representation
Female characters transition from captives in a harem to active participants in a rebellion. Mzisa demonstrates agency by facilitating movement within the rebel camp.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The story explores complex identity politics through Abdushahil, a character caught between Persian upbringing and Georgian heritage. This challenges monolithic views of ethnicity.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film critiques imperial authority through a narrative of resistance. It avoids simple binaries by revealing the 'enemy' as a victim of cultural erasure.
Disability Representation
There are no visible or invisible disabilities portrayed within the primary character arcs.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Bashi-Achuki succeeds in complicating the typical historical epic by introducing themes of ethnic fluidity and identity. The character of Abdushahil serves as a bridge between conflicting cultures, moving the story beyond a simple nationalist struggle. While the film provides agency to its female characters, it remains anchored in the romantic and structural conventions of 1950s cinema. The lack of LGBTQ+ representation and disability visibility reflects the era's limited scope. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its ability to subvert 'us vs. them' dichotomies, using the trope of the displaced individual to critique imperial structures.

1970

1966

1939

1961
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.