Back to the USSR
1992
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.2 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
A Limousine the Colour of Midsummer's Eve
1982
Director
Janis Streics
Runtime
87 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
When old auntie Mirta succeeds in a lottery and wins a car which she cannot use herself, all sorts of family members suddenly appear by her side, hoping to get the car after their auntie's death. Until then, they had never helped Mirta, it was only her neighbours who supported her in her old age. Now, her nephew Ēriks with his wife and son, and her ex-daughter-in-law Olita with her second husband and daughter, would all love to get their hands on the car that's in the colour of Midsummer's Eve.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
3.5/10
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks any indication of queer identities or non-heteronormative narrative arcs. The story focuses entirely on traditional family units.
Gender Representation
Mirta serves as a central figure of agency and economic power. This subverts common tropes regarding female passivity in old age.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The setting appears rooted in a specific Latvian cultural context. The social circle seems homogeneous, offering little evidence of ethnic blending.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The narrative deconstructs the sanctity of the nuclear family. It critiques individualistic greed by elevating the moral importance of communal neighborly bonds.
Disability Representation
There is no mention of physical, neurodivergent, or mental health representation in the story.
Strengths
- Subverts traditional gender hierarchies by centering an elderly woman with economic agency.
- Provides a sharp critique of the nuclear family through social satire.
- Elevates communal and neighborly bonds over biological kinship.
Areas for Improvement
- Lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities or queer narrative arcs.
- Offers little evidence of racial or ethnic diversity beyond its regional setting.
- Provides no representation of physical or neurodivergent disabilities.
AI Analysis
The film functions primarily as a social satire rather than a vehicle for demographic diversity. It uses a material windfall to expose the decay of kinship structures, contrasting predatory relatives against altruistic neighbors. While the film lacks intersectional casting or LGBTQ+ representation, it offers progressive social commentary by challenging the inherent morality of the nuclear family. The focus remains on localized, likely homogeneous community dynamics. Ultimately, the work prioritizes character-driven social critique over broad representation, resulting in a score that reflects its specific cultural focus and lack of diverse identity arcs.
Similar Movies
Taxi Blues
1990
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.6 out of 10
Old Hags
2000
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.6 out of 10
Winning Ticket
2018
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.0 out of 10
Pauline & Paulette
2001
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.8 out of 10
Afonya
1975
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.9 out of 10
Moscow Does Not Believe in Tears
1980
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.1 out of 10
Billionaire
1986
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.3 out of 10
Gift From Above
2003
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.6 out of 10
Old Men: Robbers
1972
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.4 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.