The Moon Is Down
1943
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.7 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
The Man I Married
1940
NRDirector
Irving Pichel
Runtime
77 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
An American vacations in Europe with her husband and watches him turn into a Nazi.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
2.3/10
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks any LGBTQ+ characters or non-cisnormative identities. Its romantic structure follows strict heteronormative conventions typical of the era.
Gender Representation
Joan Bennett’s character drives the emotional and ethical momentum of the story. She subverts the submissive domestic trope by acting as the primary arbiter of the central conflict.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The production reflects the demographic homogeneity of 1940s Hollywood. There is no significant evidence of non-white or non-Anglo-Saxon casting within the narrative.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story explores moral relativism by framing personal devotion against legal duty. It challenges legal authority through emotional dilemma rather than systemic critique.
Disability Representation
No characters are defined by physical or neurodivergent impairments. There are no visible or invisible disabilities portrayed in the film.
Strengths
- The female protagonist demonstrates significant agency and intellectual complexity.
- The narrative subverts traditional tropes of submissive domestic partners.
Areas for Improvement
- The film lacks racial and ethnic diversity in its casting.
- There is no representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisnormative characters.
- The story contains no portrayals of disability or neurodivergence.
AI Analysis
The film succeeds in providing a female protagonist with significant psychological autonomy and agency. By centering the conflict on her moral choices, it avoids the era's standard depictions of female passivity. However, the film is deeply limited by the social and demographic constraints of 1940s studio production. It offers almost no representation for racial, queer, or disabled communities. Ultimately, while it provides a nuanced look at gendered agency, the lack of intersectional depth results in a low overall diversity score.
Similar Movies
The Pied Piper
1942
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.6 out of 10
The Weaker Sex
1948
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.9 out of 10
Tomorrow, the World!
1944
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.7 out of 10
The War Against Mrs. Hadley
1942
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.3 out of 10
Suzy
1936
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.9 out of 10
The Love Light
1921
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.7 out of 10
Louis-Ferdinand Céline
2016
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.8 out of 10
Roar of the Press
1941
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.4 out of 10
The Woman on the Beach
1947
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.6 out of 10
England Made Me
1973
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.2 out of 10
Cigarettes et bas nylons
2010
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.3 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.