
How High
2001

1978
RDirector
Lou Adler
Runtime
86 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
An unemployed pot-smoking slacker and amateur drummer, Anthony Stoner ditches his strict parents and hits the road, eventually meeting kindred spirit Pedro de Pacas. While the drug-ingesting duo is soon arrested for possession of marijuana, Anthony and Pedro get released on a technicality, allowing them to continue their many misadventures and ultimately compete in a rock band contest, where they perform the raucous tune "Earache My Eye."
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks any significant narrative focus on non-heteronormative identities. The comedic duo operates within a strictly heteronormative framework without exploring queer identities.
Gender Representation
Female characters are relegated to secondary roles or romantic interests. The narrative remains almost exclusively focused on a male-centric stoner subculture, lacking female agency.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The film disrupts 1970s norms by placing Latino protagonists at the center of the story. These characters drive the plot through their own agency and subcultural pursuits.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story champions an anti-establishment lifestyle that challenges traditional Western institutions. It frames law enforcement and prohibitionist structures as comedic obstacles to personal liberty.
Disability Representation
There is no meaningful depiction of physical disability or neurodivergence. Altered states of consciousness are used as comedic archetypes rather than explorations of mental health.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Up in Smoke stands as a landmark of counterculture cinema by centering Latino protagonists in a way that was rare for 1970s mainstream comedy. This placement provides high agency to marginalized identities, driving the narrative through their own subcultural values. However, the film's focus is narrow. It largely ignores LGBTQ+ identities and provides minimal agency to female characters, who mostly serve the male protagonists' journeys. The representation of disability is also absent, treating altered states purely as comedic tropes. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its cultural defiance. It successfully subverts the era's social hierarchies by framing authority as an obstacle to freedom, even while failing to provide a diverse spectrum of identity representation.

2001

1995

2011

2017

1993

2016

2010

1982

1980

1994

2008

1995
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.