You are here:
Money Mad

Money Mad

1908

Director

D.W. Griffith

Runtime

9 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

The central figure is an old miser, a Harpagon of sorts, who, like Frosine, stashes his ill-gotten money in a secret cellar. While the miser is at the bank, exchanging stolen notes for gold coin, a couple of thugs witness the transaction and see their opportunity-- It seems avarice grips the hearts of all those who'd possess the bag.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

2.6/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film lacks any evidence of non-heteronormative identities. The narrative focuses strictly on a character study of greed, suggesting a traditional structure without queer themes.

Gender Representation

Limited

The story centers on a male miser and male antagonists. This emphasis on masculine archetypes of criminality reinforces traditional gendered power dynamics.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

There is no indication of a diverse cast or non-Anglo-Saxon characters. The work reflects the homogeneous casting standards typical of the early silent era.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Limited

The film functions as a moral fable regarding the corruptive nature of wealth. It critiques individual avarice rather than offering a systemic critique of social structures.

Disability Representation

Minimal

The narrative provides no evidence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities.

Strengths

  • The film offers a clear, focused character study of avarice and moral corruption.

Areas for Improvement

  • The narrative lacks racial and ethnic diversity, reflecting a very narrow casting scope.
  • There is a significant absence of female characters or non-heteronormative identities.
  • The story focuses on individual morality rather than exploring systemic social structures.

AI Analysis

Money Mad is a conventional early crime melodrama that prioritizes moralistic storytelling over social complexity. The plot centers on a singular character study of avarice, following an old miser and a group of thugs. Because the film relies on traditional archetypes of greed and criminality, it lacks intersectional identity or the subversion of social hierarchies. The representation is limited to the homogeneous standards of the early 20th century. Ultimately, the film serves as a moral fable about individual failings rather than a deconstruction of broader cultural or systemic issues.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.