New Showbiz

You are here:
Can You Keep It Up for a Week?

Can You Keep It Up for a Week?

1975

R

Director

Jim Atkinson

Runtime

90 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Accident-prone Gil wants a steady job but is dismissed by every company that recruits him due to his unfortunate habit of ending up in sexually embarrassing situations. His girlfriend Annette says that she will marry him only if he can stay employed for at least a week. Hired by Mr Grimwood's cleaning company "Here To Service You", Gil is unwittingly drawn into a series of bawdy misadventures: sharing a bath with a married woman and getting caught by her husband; having a threesome with a hospital patient and a woman doctor, followed by a foursome with Annette, Grimwood and a woman psychologist; awkward encounters with a gay man and a lesbian; and getting caught by Annette playing strip poker with a group of women. Incredibly, Gil remains in his job and Annette marries him, but before the couple can have their wedding night Gil collapses on the bed and passes out from exhaustion.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

3.0/10

Limited

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The film features brief encounters with a gay man and a lesbian. These characters function primarily as tools for awkward comedic mishaps rather than as individuals with independent agency.

Gender Representation

Limited

Women are central to the sexual misadventures but largely serve as objects of the protagonist's proximity. The plot reinforces traditional hierarchies and a conventional heteronormative marriage.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

The narrative lacks evidence of non-white or non-Anglo-Saxon casting. The focus remains within a standard Western comedic framework without intentional intersectional representation.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Limited

The story operates within traditional Western social structures like marriage and employment. It uses sexual transgression for comedic relief rather than critiquing religious or social institutions.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no evidence regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities in this film.

Strengths

  • Includes brief representation of both gay and lesbian characters within the comedic framework.

Areas for Improvement

  • Characters lack independent agency and often serve merely as plot devices for the protagonist's mishaps.
  • The film lacks racial and ethnic diversity, focusing on a standard Western cast.
  • Gender roles are limited to traditional hierarchies and sexualized comedic tropes.
  • The narrative fails to provide nuanced or intersectional character development.

AI Analysis

Jim Atkinson's comedy relies heavily on the mid-70s sex farce genre, prioritizing situational absurdity and sexual transgression over character depth. The narrative uses social taboos as plot drivers rather than exploring them with nuance. While the film includes LGBTQ+ characters, they are relegated to being catalysts for the protagonist's embarrassment. This approach treats queer identity as a comedic device rather than a meaningful narrative element. Ultimately, the film reinforces traditional social and romantic hierarchies. It lacks racial diversity and focuses on a narrow, heteronormative view of domestic and professional life.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.