
How I Won the War
1967

1985
Director
Luis García Berlanga
Runtime
122 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
During the Spanish Civil War a platoon of mismatched Republican soldiers cross the front-line to steal the bull that the enemy is going to fight on the local holiday of the nearby village. In addition to ruining the Nationalist faction's celebration they want the animal in order to butcher it and feed their famished troops. They get caught in the process and have to go through a series of funny and pathetic incidents before they can get back to their side.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks visible representation of non-cisnormative identities. The narrative focuses on the collective struggle of a Republican platoon during the Spanish Civil War.
Gender Representation
The story centers on a mismatched platoon of male soldiers. While it deconstructs heroic masculinity through farce, it lacks prominent female agency in the central military unit.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
Representation is constrained by the specific historical and geographical setting. The film focuses on regional and class-based identities rather than a diverse international cast.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film excels at critiquing traditional institutions. It disrupts the sanctity of religious and communal celebrations by framing the theft of a bull as a response to systemic failure.
Disability Representation
Characters exhibit physical and psychological vulnerability due to war. However, these portrayals often serve the film's satirical themes rather than providing agency to characters with disabilities.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
The Heifer serves as a biting social satire that prioritizes systemic critique over individual heroism. It effectively deconstructs the romanticized myths of warfare by highlighting the absurdity and desperation of the human condition. While the film lacks modern identity-based representation regarding LGBTQ+ and racial diversity, it finds strength in its cultural subversion. It challenges the sanctity of established social orders and traditional institutions through a lens of moral relativism. Ultimately, the film's value lies in its ability to use comedy to expose the hollow nature of authority and the systemic neglect faced by the Republican forces.

1967

1964

2024

1976

1966

1961

1997

1987

1963

1957

1966

1945
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.