
Mad to Be Normal
2017

2017
Director
Barbara Albert
Runtime
97 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
18th century Vienna. Maria Theresia von Paradis, a gifted piano player and close friend of Mozart's, lost her eye-sight as a child. Desperate to cure their talented daughter, the Paradis entrust Maria to Dr. Mesmer, a forward-thinking-physician who gives her the care and attention that she requires. With the doctor's innovative techniques of magnetism, Maria slowly recovers her sight. But this miracle comes at a price as the woman progressively starts to lose her gift for music.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks explicit depictions of LGBTQ+ identities or non-heteronormative relationships. The narrative focus remains centered on the relationship between Maria Theresia von Paradis and Dr. Mesmer.
Gender Representation
The story disrupts traditional hierarchies by centering a female protagonist whose musical mastery drives the plot. It explores the tension between female agency and the medical authority of the era.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
Set in 18th-century Vienna, the film reflects the historical demographic constraints of the period. The narrative features a predominantly white cast consistent with its localized European setting.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film highlights the tension between established medical practices and innovative techniques. It critiques the idea that scientific progress is inherently positive by showing the personal costs of a medical miracle.
Disability Representation
Visual impairment is treated as a central component of the protagonist's identity rather than a mere plot device. The film explores the complex trade-offs between medical intervention and sensory experience.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Mademoiselle Paradis offers a nuanced character study that prioritizes individual experience over spectacle. It succeeds in providing a sophisticated portrayal of disability, moving beyond simple tropes to examine the intersection of sensory differences and artistic talent. However, the film is limited by its historical setting, resulting in low racial and ethnic diversity. The lack of LGBTQ+ representation also keeps the overall score from reaching a higher tier. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its subversion of gendered expectations and its thoughtful approach to the protagonist's physical and intellectual autonomy.

2017

2008

2019

1991

2019

2024

1994

2021

2017

2024

2017

2009
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.