You are here:

Glastonbury

Glastonbury

Representation Score

8.0/10

Good

2006

R

Director

Julien Temple

Runtime

135 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Glastonbury (2006) serves as a cultural archive, documenting the festival as a multicultural space where traditional social hierarchies are temporarily set aside in favor of communal identity. The documentary effectively captures the festival's role in promoting social liberation and secular spirituality. However, its focus on musical spectacle often overlooks deeper identity-driven narratives, particularly those related to disability and gender hierarchies.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Glastonbury have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film captures the festival as a place where non-straight social expressions are normalized. Although there are few character-driven stories, the footage shows the festival's role in promoting diverse social expressions.

How does Glastonbury portray gender?

Fair

Female artists such as Björk have significant stage presence and intellectual authority. However, the film focuses more on the performance spectacle rather than deeply examining gender hierarchies.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Glastonbury?

Fair

The film showcases a wide range of ethnic diversity among performers and audiences, reflecting the festival's role as a multicultural gathering.

How does Glastonbury represent religion and culture?

Good

The documentary highlights the festival as a place of secular spirituality and alternative social organization. It celebrates a community built around shared aesthetic and social values.

Does Glastonbury include disability representation?

Fair

The film does not prominently feature narratives about neurodivergence or physical disabilities. There are limited depictions of disabled attendees in the performance-based footage.

Present on Screen

  • Successfully documents the festival as a multicultural gathering with diverse performers.
  • Highlights female artists as key figures in musical innovation and authority.
  • Captures the festival's role in promoting non-traditional social expressions.

Limited or Absent

  • Could include more narratives focused on the lived experiences of disabled attendees.
  • Needs to provide a more structured critique of gender hierarchies in the music industry.
  • Should explore more character-driven stories related to sexual orientation.

Official Synopsis

Julien Temple's 2006 documentary film about the famous music festival from 1970 to 2005, featuring performances from artists such as David Bowie, Bjork, Blur, Oasis and Coldplay. The film is made up of footage shot by Temple at the festival in 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005, as well as footage sent in by festival goers after a request on websites and newspapers for footage. Temple had initially only agreed to make a film of the 2002 festival after organiser Michael Eavis expressed concern that that would be the last year of the festival. Temple then realised that he wanted to make a film detailing the full history of the festival. The film also includes footage shot by Channel 4 and the BBC during their coverage of the festival since 1994. Text from Wikipedia.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.