
Perversion for Profit
1965

2010
NRDirector
Curtis Bowers
Runtime
93 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
When Idaho Legislator Curtis Bowers wrote a "letter to the editor" about the drastic changes in America's culture, it became the feature story on the evening news, people protested at the Capitol, and for weeks the local newspapers were filled with responses. He realized then... he'd hit on something. Ask almost anyone and you'll hear, "Communism is dead! The Berlin Wall came down." Thought the word communism isn't used anymore, this film will show the ideas behind it are alive and well. Join Bowers for a fascinating look at the people and groups that have successfully targeted America's morality and freedom in their effort to grind America down. It's a well documented AGENDA.
Overall Score
Minimal
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film frames shifting social mores as a systemic threat to traditional morality. LGBTQ+ identities appear to be treated as components of a perceived ideological agenda rather than nuanced characters.
Gender Representation
The narrative focuses on defending traditional social structures and morality. It reinforces conventional gender hierarchies by framing the disruption of these roles as a targeted attack on freedom.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The film centers on a localized Idaho context and traditional Western demographic norms. There is no indication of a diverse or non-Anglo-Saxon majority cast.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The core thesis critiques anti-Western influences and views the deconstruction of established social orders as a negative force. It prioritizes the defense of traditional Western institutions.
Disability Representation
The film provides no evidence regarding the inclusion or portrayal of characters with physical or neurodivergent disabilities.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Agenda: Grinding America Down is a political documentary that prioritizes the preservation of traditional Western values. The film functions as a critique of progressive cultural shifts, viewing modern social movements as threats to institutional stability. Because the narrative is designed to challenge contemporary social changes, it lacks intersectional depth. The focus remains on a conservative defense of morality and traditionalism rather than the representation of diverse identities. Ultimately, the film's perspective is rooted in a specific ideological framework that views the deconstruction of traditional norms as a systemic effort to undermine the country.

1965

2020
2016

2012

2016

2012

2010

2014

2010

1950

2014

2009
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.