
Zeitgeist: Moving Forward
2011

2016
Director
Adam Curtis
Runtime
167 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
We live in a world where the powerful deceive us. We know they lie. They know we know they lie. They do not care. We say we care, but we do nothing, and nothing ever changes. It is normal. Welcome to the post-truth world. How we got to where we are now…
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The documentary lacks specific character arcs or depictions of queer identities. It does not center on LGBTQ+ lived experiences or critique heteronormativity through representation.
Gender Representation
The film relies heavily on archival footage of male political figures. Its focus on Cold War politics and neoliberal finance largely bypasses gendered agency and female leadership.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The narrative examines the global implications of neoliberalism beyond an Anglo-centric vacuum. While it includes global actors, the focus remains on Western institutional power mechanics.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film offers a sophisticated critique of capitalism and Western institutions. It portrays neoliberal systems as drivers of social fragmentation and explores how truth is used as statecraft.
Disability Representation
There are no specific depictions of disability or neurodivergence. The film's focus on political theory and historical processes precludes individual representation of physical or mental impairment.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
HyperNormalisation is a dense, semiotic exploration of systemic power rather than a character-driven narrative. It excels at deconstructing Western hegemony and the mechanics of institutional control, providing a profound critique of how reality is manufactured by dominant powers. However, the film's reliance on historical archival footage creates significant gaps in representation. The focus on high-level geopolitical shifts results in a landscape dominated by masculine-coded political spheres and a lack of diverse personal identities. Ultimately, the work is intellectually progressive in its systemic analysis but fails to provide meaningful visibility for specific marginalized groups, such as the LGBTQ+ community or individuals with disabilities.

2011

2016

2013

2013

2004

2015

2009

2017

2016

2019

2019

2019
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.