You are here:

Stand by for Tape Back-up

No Poster Available

Representation Score

5.2/10

Fair

2015

Director

Ross Sutherland

Runtime

63 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Ross Sutherland’s experimental documentary critiques media consumption by rebuilding fragments of old films and TV shows. The work challenges the stability of historical archives and the repetitive cycles of traditional broadcasting. The film lacks explicit, character-driven action for specific identity groups, which limits its scores in identity-specific categories. Instead, it focuses on the symbolic implications of its non-linear structure and the themes of memory and mortality. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its structural disruption of conventional media. It uses the 'rerun' to highlight the exclusionary nature of historical records rather than providing direct representation.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Stand by for Tape Back-up have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film's LGBTQ presence comes from the found footage it uses. While it doesn't center LGBTQ stories, its deconstruction of older media suggests a subtle critique of traditional representation.

How does Stand by for Tape Back-up portray gender?

Fair

By removing vintage media fragments from their original context, the film disrupts traditional gender roles. However, the lack of character-driven action prevents a higher score.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Stand by for Tape Back-up?

Fair

The documentary uses archival fragments that historically lack diversity or rely on clichés. The film highlights the erasure of diverse voices without acting as a corrective casting project.

How does Stand by for Tape Back-up represent religion and culture?

Good

The narrative prioritizes temporal instability and the fallibility of memory. This approach critiques singular historical narratives in favor of a more fluid, decentralized view of cultural heritage.

Does Stand by for Tape Back-up include disability representation?

Minimal

The experimental, found-footage nature of the work provides insufficient evidence to evaluate the portrayal of disability or neurodivergence.

Present on Screen

  • Challenges traditional narrative structures through an avant-garde, experimental approach.
  • Critiques gendered hierarchies by recontextualizing vintage media fragments.
  • Offers a sophisticated postmodern view of cultural heritage and historical instability.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks explicit, character-driven action for specific identity groups.
  • Relies on archival footage that may inherently lack racial diversity.
  • Provides insufficient evidence regarding the representation of disability.

Official Synopsis

Poet Ross Sutherland takes fragments of old films and TV shows and rebuilds them into an audiovisual meditation on memory, death and reruns.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.