You are here:

Goltzius & the Pelican Company

Name: Goltzius & the Pelican Company
Director: Peter Greenaway
Released: 2012
Duration: 128 min

2012

Not Rated

Director

Peter Greenaway

Runtime

128 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Goltzius and the Pelican Company tells the story of Hendrik Goltzius, a late 16th century Dutch printer and engraver of erotic prints. A contemporary of Rembrandt and, indeed, more celebrated during his life, Goltzius seduces the Margrave of Alsace into paying for a printing press to make and publish illustrated books. In return, he promises him an extraordinary book of pictures of illustrating the Old Testament’s biblical stories. Erotic tales of Lot and his daughters, David and Bathsheba, Samson and Deliah and John the Baptist and Salome. To tempt the Margrave further, Goltzius and his printing company will offer to perform dramatisations of these erotic stories for his court.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.0/10

Fair

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film explores desire through erotic engravings and biblical archetypes. However, it lacks explicit focus on non-cisnormative identities or a contemporary queer critique of heteronormativity.

Gender Representation

Fair

The narrative disrupts traditional hierarchies by focusing on the artist's gaze rather than passive muses. Women are presented as complex participants in a transactional artistic ecosystem.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The cast is predominantly white to maintain historical accuracy for the 16th-century Dutch Renaissance setting. The film does not utilize race-bent casting or diverse metaphors.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

Biblical stories are treated as aesthetic objects for political maneuvering rather than moral truths. The work remains deeply rooted in Western European intellectualism and art history.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no evidence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities serving as central plot devices or possessing specific agency within the narrative.

Strengths

Subverts the traditional 'passive muse' trope by centering the artist's gaze.
Offers a nuanced exploration of how gender is performed and commodified through art.
Uses religious iconography to facilitate intellectual and political inquiry.

Areas for Improvement

Lacks explicit representation of non-cisnormative identities or queer perspectives.
Maintains a strictly Eurocentric focus that lacks broader ethnic diversity.
Does not engage with modern intersectional frameworks to challenge social hierarchies.

AI Analysis

Peter Greenaway’s film is a highly stylized, postmodern reconstruction of the Renaissance that prioritizes aesthetic deconstruction over modern social representation. It succeeds in subverting the 'muse' trope by examining how gender and desire are commodified through the artistic gaze. However, the film is heavily constrained by its commitment to a Eurocentric, period-specific aesthetic. While it uses religious iconography as a tool for secular inquiry, it does not actively dismantle racial or gendered hierarchies through an intersectional lens. Ultimately, the work functions as a series of artificial tableaux vivants. It challenges historical realism but remains tethered to the social and ethnic constraints of its 16th-century setting.

How are these scores produced? →