
The Decameron
1971

Representation Score
Fair
1972
NC-17Director
Pier Paolo Pasolini
Runtime
111 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetNew Showbiz Analysis
Pasolini’s work reinterprets classical literature by focusing on the natural aspects of human life, challenging traditional moralizing. The film stands out by rejecting the sanctity of established institutions, favoring a perspective that honors the lived experiences of the underrepresented peasantry. While the film effectively critiques religious and feudal hierarchies and subverts traditional gender roles, it falls short in exploring non-traditional gender identities. Its focus remains on primal, physical interactions that align with conventional sexual dynamics. Ultimately, the film’s strength lies in its commitment to earthy realism. By emphasizing the carnal over the institutional, it challenges societal norms and offers a progressive critique of upper-class morality.
Category Breakdown
The film focuses on physical interactions and primal desires rather than explicit queer narratives. It avoids derogatory stereotypes and highlights the natural, carnal aspects of human relationships.
Women are depicted who play a significant role in driving the story and power. By centering female lust and volatility, the film subverts the cliché of the submissive woman, presenting them as active participants in social dynamics.
The film features a diverse cast of non-professional actors, creating a gritty and realistic portrayal of peasants. This approach contrasts with the polished look of typical Western period dramas.
Pasolini criticizes religious and feudal powers by portraying them as hypocritical. The film presents the transgressive behaviors of the peasantry in a naturalistic, non-judgmental manner, embracing moral relativism.
There is no significant depiction of characters using disability as a central plot device or being mocked.
Present on Screen
Limited or Absent
Official Synopsis
Glimpses of Chaucer penning his famous work are sprinkled through this re-enactment of several of his stories.

1971

1974

1972

1972

1972

2015

1973

1972
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.