New Showbiz
You are here:

Naked and Cruel

Naked and Cruel

Representation Score

6.1/10

Good

1984

Director

Bitto Albertini

Runtime

96 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Bitto Albertini’s documentary serves as a deconstruction of the civilized Western gaze. Its primary strength is the refusal to impose a Western moral hierarchy on the diverse cultures it observes. By presenting a global tapestry of the sacred and the profane, the film challenges the idea of a universal moral standard. However, the film's focus on the visceral and the transgressive often comes at the expense of nuanced character development. While it succeeds in decentralizing Western perspectives, the emphasis on sexual acts and anatomy can lead to the objectification of the subjects being documented.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Naked and Cruel have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film explores sexual taboos and intimacy that challenge traditional heterosexual norms. However, it focuses more on sexual acts and anatomy than on specific LGBTQ+ identities or character-driven stories.

How does Naked and Cruel portray gender?

Fair

The documentary deconstructs traditional gender roles by emphasizing bodily autonomy and sexual rituals. While it challenges social hierarchies, the portrayal of women often leans toward objectification rather than giving them a significant role in driving the story.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Naked and Cruel?

Excellent

The film offers significant racial breadth by moving beyond Anglo-Saxon centricity. By centering narratives in India, Japan, Thailand, and Africa, it presents a non-Western majority view of the world.

How does Naked and Cruel represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The work excels at disrupting Western institutional morality through moral relativism. It presents global practices without a singular Western or Christian lens, prioritizing naturalism over structured social order.

Does Naked and Cruel include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no significant evidence regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities within the film's content.

Present on Screen

  • Offers a broad racial and ethnic diversity through a globalized perspective.
  • Disrupts Western institutional morality and moralizing lenses effectively.
  • Decentralizes Western perspectives by focusing on non-Western rituals and customs.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks explicit, character-driven LGBTQ+ narratives or identities.
  • Tends to objectify women within sexualized contexts.
  • Focuses more on sexual acts and anatomy over complex human ability to act.

Official Synopsis

Documentary about strange or grotesque things around the world: the sacred city of Benares, India, where old men go to die and be cremated; an american tourist in Hong-Kong, who buys a "baby-prostitute"; many animals having sex; the celebration in honor of a totem with the shape of a penis, in Japan; topless and prostitution places; an african tribe in which the men have gigantic male organs; a massage parlour in Thailand; snakes being eaten almost alive; hunting and safaris in Africa; a ranger being eaten by an alligator, in Florida; a missionary priest being eaten by indians; the betting clubs and strip-tease joints in Las Vegas; and much more.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.