You are here:

Taboos of the World

Taboos of the World

Representation Score

3.8/10

Limited

1963

Director

Romolo Marcellini

Runtime

86 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Taboos of the World operates through a voyeuristic lens that prioritizes sensationalism over nuanced human representation. The film's structure relies on the 'othering' of global customs to entertain a Western audience. By framing diverse traditions as repulsive or strange, the documentary reinforces colonial-era hierarchies. It lacks the reflexive framework necessary to provide ability to act to its subjects, treating them instead as objects of curiosity. Ultimately, the work functions as a product of its era, utilizing ethnographic clichés to maintain a sense of Western normalcy against a perceived deviant world.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Taboos of the World have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film does not include intentional LGBTQ+ character development or narratives. Depictions of non-straight identities may focus on sensationalism or deviance rather than identity-driven stories.

How does Taboos of the World portray gender?

Limited

Women appear as passive participants in rituals rather than active agents. The film reinforces traditional, reductive gender roles through an exoticizing gaze typical of 1960s documentaries.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Taboos of the World?

Fair

While featuring non-Anglo-Saxon subjects, the film treats people of color as objects of curiosity. This approach aligns with colonial-era ethnographic clichés rather than meaningful representation.

How does Taboos of the World represent religion and culture?

Limited

The narrative reinforces a Western-centric hierarchy by framing diverse customs as repulsive or taboo. It positions the Western viewer as the stable observer of a deviant world.

Does Taboos of the World include disability representation?

Minimal

Physical differences or medical conditions are likely used as spectacle to meet the film's sensationalist goals. Characters with disabilities lack real control over their lives.

Present on Screen

  • The film offers a broad look at various global customs and traditions from a mid-century ethnographic perspective.

Limited or Absent

  • The film relies on sensationalism and 'othering' rather than providing depth or ability to act to its subjects.
  • The narrative structure reinforces Western-centric hierarchies by framing non-Western practices as deviant or repulsive.
  • Representation of women and people of color lacks progressive intentionality, often treating them as passive objects of curiosity.

Official Synopsis

Documentary feature, re-edited for English-speaking countries, that gratuitously examines customs around the globe, focusing on repulsive sights and strange bits of knowledge about human customs

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.