New Showbiz

You are here:
A Lizard in a Woman's Skin

A Lizard in a Woman's Skin

1971

R

Director

Lucio Fulci

Runtime

104 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Carol Hammond, the sexually frustrated wife of a successful London lawyer, is having bizarre, erotic dreams about her uninhibited neighbour, Julia Durer, who presides over noisy, sex and drug filled parties in the house next door. One night, Carol dreams culminate in violent death and she wakes to find her nightmares have become reality - Julia has been murdered and Carol is the main suspect. Was she set up, or did she really do it?

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

3.1/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film adheres to a traditional heteronormative framework typical of early 1970s giallo. It focuses on sexual obsession and voyeurism without presenting non-cisnormative identities or queer critiques.

Gender Representation

Fair

Carol Hammond drives the psychological mystery, yet she remains subject to the predatory male gaze. While her instability disrupts the stable female lead trope, male characters retain investigative and predatory power.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

The cast is largely homogeneous, reflecting the European high-society setting of the era. There is no use of diverse casting to challenge the social constraints of the period.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The narrative critiques the decadence and moral emptiness of the Western aristocracy. It uses moral relativism to challenge the perceived stability of upper-class values and traditional social structures.

Disability Representation

Limited

Mental health and neurodivergence are explored through the protagonist's hallucinatory nightmares. However, these elements serve the thriller's tension rather than providing a nuanced depiction of lived experience.

Strengths

  • Challenges the perceived moral superiority and stability of the Western aristocratic class.
  • Disrupts traditional female lead tropes by portraying the protagonist through psychological instability.
  • Uses moral relativism to create a complex, subjective ethical landscape.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks racial and ethnic diversity, maintaining a homogeneous cast.
  • Operates within a strictly heteronormative framework without queer representation.
  • Uses mental health primarily as a plot device for tension rather than nuanced characterization.

AI Analysis

Lucio Fulci’s film prioritizes psychological transgression and the deconstruction of social facades over demographic intersectionality. The narrative finds its strength in challenging the moral certainty of the aristocracy, replacing it with a chaotic, subjective ethical landscape. However, the film remains limited by the period's conventions. It lacks racial and LGBTQ+ diversity, focusing instead on a homogeneous Western socio-economic class and traditional sexual dynamics. Ultimately, the work functions as a character study of psychological unraveling. While it subverts certain gender tropes through the protagonist's instability, it does not systematically dismantle masculine authority or provide agency to its depictions of mental health.

How are these scores produced? →

Similar Movies

Movie poster for What Have You Done to Solange?

What Have You Done to Solange?

1972

No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.4 out of 10

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.