
What Have You Done to Solange?
1972

1971
RDirector
Lucio Fulci
Runtime
104 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Carol Hammond, the sexually frustrated wife of a successful London lawyer, is having bizarre, erotic dreams about her uninhibited neighbour, Julia Durer, who presides over noisy, sex and drug filled parties in the house next door. One night, Carol dreams culminate in violent death and she wakes to find her nightmares have become reality - Julia has been murdered and Carol is the main suspect. Was she set up, or did she really do it?
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film adheres to a traditional heteronormative framework typical of early 1970s giallo. It focuses on sexual obsession and voyeurism without presenting non-cisnormative identities or queer critiques.
Gender Representation
Carol Hammond drives the psychological mystery, yet she remains subject to the predatory male gaze. While her instability disrupts the stable female lead trope, male characters retain investigative and predatory power.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The cast is largely homogeneous, reflecting the European high-society setting of the era. There is no use of diverse casting to challenge the social constraints of the period.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The narrative critiques the decadence and moral emptiness of the Western aristocracy. It uses moral relativism to challenge the perceived stability of upper-class values and traditional social structures.
Disability Representation
Mental health and neurodivergence are explored through the protagonist's hallucinatory nightmares. However, these elements serve the thriller's tension rather than providing a nuanced depiction of lived experience.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Lucio Fulci’s film prioritizes psychological transgression and the deconstruction of social facades over demographic intersectionality. The narrative finds its strength in challenging the moral certainty of the aristocracy, replacing it with a chaotic, subjective ethical landscape. However, the film remains limited by the period's conventions. It lacks racial and LGBTQ+ diversity, focusing instead on a homogeneous Western socio-economic class and traditional sexual dynamics. Ultimately, the work functions as a character study of psychological unraveling. While it subverts certain gender tropes through the protagonist's instability, it does not systematically dismantle masculine authority or provide agency to its depictions of mental health.

1972

1972

1971

1965

1973

1975

1971

1975

1971

1972

1972

1972
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.