You are here:

State of Dogs

State of Dogs

Representation Score

8.2/10

Excellent

1998

Director

Turmunkh Dorjkhand, Peter Brosens

Runtime

91 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

State of Dogs challenges Western-centric documentary norms by focusing on the socio-political realities of Ulan Bator in Mongolia. Through its narrative, the film offers a strong counter-narrative to homogeneous mainstream media. The film's critique of institutional power is particularly effective, using the experiences of animals to highlight the struggles of underrepresented entities against state authority. However, the film does not delve deeply into human identity markers such as gender or sexuality. The narrative primarily explores the intersection of human and non-human existence rather than traditional human social dynamics.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does State of Dogs have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film does not include any explicit LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. Its primary focus is on the treatment of animals in Ulan Bator, avoiding discussions of human sexuality.

How does State of Dogs portray gender?

Fair

Gender dynamics are not explicitly explored. The documentary shifts focus away from typical human protagonists, leading to a moderate depiction of gender hierarchies.

How racially and ethnically diverse is State of Dogs?

Excellent

The film highlights a non-Western setting in Mongolia. By emphasizing the local ability to act and unique cultural landscape of Ulan Bator, it disrupts Western-centric documentary conventions.

How does State of Dogs represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The narrative criticizes state-sanctioned authority and institutional oppression. It portrays the struggle of the dog, Baatar, against centralized control and mandated order.

Does State of Dogs include disability representation?

Fair

No specific mention of human physical disabilities is made. However, the dogs' marginal existence serves as a metaphor for those navigating systemic neglect.

Present on Screen

  • Disrupts Western-centric narrative conventions by focusing on a Mongolian perspective.
  • Critiques state-sanctioned authority and institutional oppression effectively.
  • Uses non-human subjects to explore systemic neglect and ability to act.

Limited or Absent

  • Does not include explicit LGBTQ+ narratives or characters.
  • Does not clearly address gendered power dynamics or subversion of gender roles.
  • Focuses less on human-centric diversity markers like neurodivergence or physical disability.

Official Synopsis

In Ulan Bator, Mongolia, the cur Baatar is shot by a hunter hired by the authorities to get rid off the dogs in the city...

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.