New Showbiz

You are here:
Just Eat It: A Food Waste Story

Just Eat It: A Food Waste Story

2014

Not Rated

Director

Grant Baldwin

Runtime

75 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

We all love food. As a society, we devour countless cooking shows, culinary magazines and foodie blogs. So how could we possibly be throwing nearly 50% of it in the trash? Filmmakers and food lovers Jen and Grant dive into the issue of waste from farm, through retail, all the way to the back of their own fridge. After catching a glimpse of the billions of dollars of good food that is tossed each year in North America, they pledge to quit grocery shopping and survive only on discarded food. What they find is truly shocking.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.5/10

Fair

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The film lacks explicit mention of LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. It focuses primarily on the logistical and ethical dimensions of food waste rather than queer identities.

Gender Representation

Fair

The narrative is driven by a duo, Jen and Grant, providing a collaborative gender dynamic. However, it is unclear if the film subverts traditional hierarchies or maintains a conventional partnership.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The documentary centers on North American food systems and the filmmakers' personal experiences. There is no evidence of a diverse cast or non-Anglo-Saxon majority representation.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The film offers a strong critique of capitalist efficiency and consumerist structures. By highlighting discarded resources, it challenges traditional market stability and modern commercial institutions.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no information available regarding the depiction of physical or neurodivergent identities within this documentary.

Strengths

  • Provides a sharp critique of capitalist consumption and wasteful economic structures.
  • Challenges traditional consumer behavior through a unique, mission-driven narrative lens.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks visible intersectional identity markers such as racial or LGBTQ+ representation.
  • The narrative scope remains limited to the specific experiences of the primary filmmakers.

AI Analysis

The documentary functions as a specialized social commentary on systemic waste rather than a study in intersectional identity. While it excels at critiquing economic structures and consumer behavior, it lacks visible markers for many marginalized groups. The film's strength lies in its systemic critique of North American food cycles. However, the narrative appears narrow in scope, focusing on the personal journey of the filmmakers within a specific socioeconomic context. Ultimately, the lack of diverse representation across gender, race, and LGBTQ+ identities results in a moderate score despite its impactful cultural commentary.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.