
Mr. Smith Goes to Washington
1939

1936
NRDirector
Frank Capra
Runtime
115 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Longfellow Deeds lives in a small town, leading a small town kind of life. When a relative dies and leaves Deeds a fortune, Longfellow moves to the big city where he becomes an instant target for everyone. Deeds outwits them all until Babe Bennett comes along. When small-town boy meets big-city girl anything can, and does, happen.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks LGBTQ+ characters or non-heteronormative identities. The romantic arc focuses entirely on a traditional heterosexual pairing between the protagonist and the female lead.
Gender Representation
Babe Bennett disrupts 1930s tropes by displaying significant agency and intellectual spirit. While the romance follows period expectations, she avoids the passive feminine archetypes common to the era.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The cast is largely homogeneous and white, reflecting the demographic constraints of 1936. There is an absence of racial diversity within the central narrative or social circles.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story offers a sophisticated critique of predatory capitalism and corrupt legal institutions. It champions populist morality against the exploitative nature of urban wealth and concentrated power.
Disability Representation
There are no prominent depictions of physical or neurodivergent disabilities used as central plot drivers or character identifiers.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Mr. Deeds Goes to Town is a study in populist idealism that prioritizes moral agency over demographic breadth. While the film fails to include racial or LGBTQ+ diversity, it succeeds in subverting institutional authority through its narrative structure. The film's strength lies in its critique of systemic corruption and its relatively progressive treatment of its female lead. It positions the individual against a predatory capitalist machine, providing a thematic depth that transcends its era's social limitations. Ultimately, the score reflects a tension between a lack of identity-based representation and a strong, subversive social commentary.

1939

1960

1938

1934

1950

1993

1961

1961

1981

1956

1942

1994
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.