
The Measure of a Man
2015

2022
Director
Stéphane Brizé
Runtime
96 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
An executive manager, his wife and his family, at the point when his professional choices are about to overturn all their lives. Philippe Lemesle and his wife are separating, their love irretrievably damaged by pressures of work. A successful executive in industrial conglomerate, Philippe no longer knows how to respond to the contradictory demands of his bosses. Yesterday they wanted a manager, today an enforcer. Now he must decide what his life really means.
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks queer perspectives or non-heteronormative identities. The central conflict focuses on the dissolution of a traditional marriage and the protagonist's professional alienation.
Gender Representation
The narrative deconstructs traditional masculine leadership by portraying the protagonist as ineffective and overwhelmed. However, female characters lack independent agency, appearing mostly in relation to the domestic crisis.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The film presents a relatively homogeneous social environment. It focuses on the existential struggles of a specific socio-economic class within a contemporary French setting.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story offers a sophisticated critique of modern capitalist structures and bureaucratic absurdity. It challenges the idealization of Western domesticity by showing how professional pressures damage the family unit.
Disability Representation
While no physical disabilities are featured, the film explores psychological alienation and existential burnout. These internal struggles are treated as philosophical inquiries rather than specific disability narratives.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Stéphane Brizé’s film is a study of systemic alienation rather than demographic variety. It finds its strength in a postmodern critique of capitalism, dismantling the trope of the successful executive to reveal the psychological fragmentation caused by modern institutions. However, the film lacks intersectional depth. The narrative remains centered on a homogeneous social group, offering little representation of LGBTQ+ identities, diverse ethnic perspectives, or characters with visible disabilities. Ultimately, the work prioritizes a specific socio-economic and existential inquiry over broad social representation, resulting in a narrow but focused thematic lens.

2015

2018

2014

1999

2003

2016

2011

2017

2013

1999

2001

2003
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.