New Showbiz

You are here:
Me Too

Me Too

2012

Not Rated

Director

Aleksei Balabanov

Runtime

89 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Five passengers - the Bandit, his friend Matvei, Matvei's old father, the Musician, and a young woman - race along an empty road in a big black jeep, searching for the Belfry of Happiness which, according to hearsay, lies somewhere between St. Petersburg and the town of Uglich, near a deserted nuclear power station. The Belfry takes people, but it does not take everyone. Each of the five passengers believes that he or she will be chosen.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.0/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks explicit LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. It prioritizes survival and existential dread over identity-based discourse, offering no intentional queer agency.

Gender Representation

Fair

Gender dynamics reflect a systemic social collapse rather than a subversion of roles. The female protagonist shows resilience within a predatory environment, but the film avoids centering feminist empowerment.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The cast is relatively homogeneous, mirroring the demographic realities of post-Soviet Russia. The narrative focuses on national identity fractures rather than intersectional racial exploration.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The film excels in critiquing decaying institutions and corrupt state structures. It favors moral relativism and a postmodern, skeptical view of organized religion and traditional morality.

Disability Representation

Limited

There is no significant or intentional representation of physical or neurodivergent disabilities. Character struggles are defined by socioeconomic and existential factors instead.

Strengths

  • Strong cultural subversion that challenges established Western-style capitalism and state structures.
  • Effective use of moral relativism to critique a crumbling social order.
  • A profound exploration of postmodern skepticism toward organized religion.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lack of intentional representation for LGBTQ+ identities or queer agency.
  • Minimal racial and ethnic diversity within the cast.
  • Absence of meaningful narratives involving physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

AI Analysis

Balabanov’s film is a study in postmodern nihilism, using a road-movie structure to explore a fractured, post-Soviet landscape. It succeeds as a cultural critique, aggressively challenging the stability of Western-aligned institutions and traditional moral frameworks through a lens of moral relativism. However, the film lacks demographic breadth. It provides almost no representation for LGBTQ+ identities, racial diversity, or disability, focusing instead on a homogeneous group navigating a landscape of decay. Ultimately, the work is a specialized exploration of national identity and institutional decay rather than a diverse social tapestry.

How are these scores produced? →

Similar Movies

Movie poster for Happy Days

Happy Days

1991

No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.3 out of 10

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.