You are here:
¿Qué hacemos con los hijos?

¿Qué hacemos con los hijos?

1967

Director

Pedro Lazaga Sabater

Runtime

95 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

The driver Antonio, boasts of his sons: John, who shares his work as a taxi driver, Luisa, ladies hairdresser, Antonito, studying to be a lawyer, and Paloma, to be a housewife. But Antonio does not know that their children are not exactly as he thinks. The day Antonio finds out, confronts his wife and children and suffers a big disappointment. Since then no one in the family speaks to Antonio, and he believes that it is best to let them see for themselves that they made a mistake, but this does not result, since each will see their problems increased.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

3.0/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film utilizes a 'hidden truth' trope where children's deviations from social norms cause domestic friction. There is no explicit evidence of celebrated LGBTQ+ identities.

Gender Representation

Fair

A traditional hierarchy is established through Antonio and Paloma, who aspires to be a housewife. Tension arises from women like Luisa entering the workforce.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

The film depicts a homogeneous Spanish social unit. There is no evidence of racial blending or diverse ethnic casting within the narrative.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Limited

The story focuses on the nuclear family and parental authority. Conflict stems from the perceived breakdown of traditional morality and family cohesion.

Disability Representation

Minimal

No visible or invisible disabilities are portrayed as central to the character arcs or the progression of the plot.

Strengths

  • Explores the generational rift between traditionalist parents and their children.
  • Highlights the burgeoning agency of women entering the workforce.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks intentional subversion of established social and gender hierarchies.
  • Maintains a homogeneous racial and ethnic perspective.
  • Relies on tropes of hidden identities to drive domestic conflict.

AI Analysis

This 1967 comedy serves as a window into the friction between rigid patriarchal expectations and a changing younger generation. The narrative centers on a father's disappointment when his children fail to meet his prescribed social roles. While the film touches on social shifts, it does so through a lens of domestic discord rather than progressive celebration. The tension is rooted in the breakdown of traditional structures rather than the subversion of them. Ultimately, the film functions as a study of mid-century social transition, emphasizing the conflict inherent in a society moving away from strict, traditionalist hierarchies.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.