You are here:

Push Comes to Shove

Name: Push Comes to Shove
Director: Bill Plympton
Released: 1991
Duration: 6 min

Representation Score

6.7/10

Good

1991

Director

Bill Plympton

Runtime

6 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Bill Plympton’s animation prioritizes avant-garde visual storytelling and the absurdity of the human condition over mainstream demographic representation. The film challenges physical and social norms through its metamorphic style but lacks verifiable, multi-layered character depth. While the film disrupts conventional cinematic expectations, it provides little concrete evidence of diverse racial or identity-based representation.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Push Comes to Shove have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film includes symbolic representations of intimacy that may challenge traditional romantic archetypes, but does not clearly define LGBTQ+ identities.

How does Push Comes to Shove portray gender?

Fair

Gender roles are explored through an absurd lens that undermines traditional social expectations of masculinity and femininity.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Push Comes to Shove?

Limited

The highly stylized, metamorphic animation often causes characters to transcend specific racial signifiers, making it difficult to verify a diverse, non-Anglo-Saxon cast.

How does Push Comes to Shove represent religion and culture?

Good

The work deconstructs polished social interactions and chaotic, individualistic realities, eschewing traditional Western family structures.

Does Push Comes to Shove include disability representation?

Fair

Characters with distorted, fluid, or non-normative physicalities disrupt standard expectations of able-bodied stability and neurotypical social behavior.

Present on Screen

Challenges traditional physical and neurotypical expectations through surreal, non-normative character designs.
Subverts conventional gender hierarchies and social structures through an absurd, individualistic lens.
Deconstructs polished social interactions to emphasize subjective, chaotic human experiences.

Limited or Absent

Lacks verifiable evidence of a diverse, non-Anglo-Saxon cast due to highly abstract character designs.
Provides little clarity regarding explicit LGBTQ+ identities or specific character demographics.
Relies on stylistic abstraction rather than explicit, multi-layered character depth.

Official Synopsis

It's the little things that really hurt.

How are these scores produced? →